Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: implement more x509 parsers #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2019
Merged

chore: implement more x509 parsers #6

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2019

Conversation

moul
Copy link
Owner

@moul moul commented Aug 12, 2019

No description provided.

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Aug 12, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6 into master will decrease coverage by 3.56%.
The diff coverage is 8.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #6      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   19.08%   15.51%   -3.57%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         241      348     +107     
==========================================
+ Hits           46       54       +8     
- Misses        194      293      +99     
  Partials        1        1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cryptoguess/guess_x509.go 17.5% <8.33%> (-82.5%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 550e9d8...0815d2a. Read the comment docs.

@moul moul merged commit 9455646 into master Aug 12, 2019
@moul moul deleted the dev/moul/more-x509 branch August 12, 2019 09:55
@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added ✨ Merged Pull Request has been merged successfully and removed 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet labels Aug 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✨ Merged Pull Request has been merged successfully
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant