Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write functional tests that cover the tokenserver functionality, or modernize the old tokenserver load tester and use that #868

Closed
fzzzy opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
8 Estimate - xl - Moderately complex, medium effort, some uncertainty. tokenserver

Comments

@fzzzy
Copy link
Contributor

fzzzy commented Oct 19, 2020

There's some very old load testing code for the tokenserver that could be modernized to get functional test coverage. We should either modernize it or copy the same tests into something modern.

@fzzzy fzzzy added 5 Estimate - l - Moderately complex, will require some effort but clearly defined. tokenserver labels Oct 19, 2020
@fzzzy fzzzy added this to Prioritized in Services Engineering Oct 20, 2020
@fzzzy fzzzy added 8 Estimate - xl - Moderately complex, medium effort, some uncertainty. and removed 5 Estimate - l - Moderately complex, will require some effort but clearly defined. labels Oct 21, 2020
@tublitzed tublitzed moved this from Prioritized to Backlog: Sync in Services Engineering Jan 19, 2021
@rehandalal rehandalal added this to To do in Tokenserver via automation Apr 15, 2021
@ethowitz
Copy link
Contributor

ethowitz commented Jun 1, 2021

Duplicate of #1048

@ethowitz ethowitz marked this as a duplicate of #1048 Jun 1, 2021
@ethowitz ethowitz closed this as completed Jun 1, 2021
Services Engineering automation moved this from Backlog: Sync to Done Jun 1, 2021
Tokenserver automation moved this from To do to Done Jun 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
8 Estimate - xl - Moderately complex, medium effort, some uncertainty. tokenserver
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants