Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
GitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
This is a really great idea, but a hand-picked list of 61 one-to-one mappings isn't going to do much to dispel the feeling that Firefox 57 is decimating the Add-On ecosystem. This feels like a great prototype, but if it's going to be linked in official help pages it needs to be a lot more than that.
Firstly, there should be a big prominent link for "Know of an alternative we're missing? Add it here!" It should spam a designated inbox, or be a Google Spreadsheets form, or something. Even a properly labelled link to the "official" suggestions thread would be a start, though "register for yet another forum" isn't that encouraging.
Secondly, get rid of the three-column spreadsheet and put the list in a text file in this repo. Then people can make suggestions by Pull Request too. (There's no link to this repo on the page either, I had to reverse engineer the Github URL, so add that. And a README.)
Thirdly, if you're going to hand-vet the entries, a couple of minutes glancing at each one would seem sensible. You currently have no alternative listed for FireGestures, but have Foxy Gestures as an alternative to something else. The summary of that extension is "Mouse gestures for Firefox. A web extension alternative to FireGestures created by a long time FireGestures user."
Fourthly, on that note, you should be canvassing every author of a WebExtensions add-on for suggestions of legacy add-ons it could be a replacement for. Implement #9 and you won't be in the position of having to pick a favourite.
Finally, I'm not sure why this tool even exists, since addons.mozilla.org apparently built a feature for managing these alternatives already. That seems like a more natural home, although I've no idea if it's actually live, or if anyone ever loaded any data.
A couple of addenda:
Hi, I realise this isn't really your problem to solve, but I had hoped to convince you the problem was real, and would be better able to find who to call out to than I am.
This really should have been one of the first projects Mozilla kicked off when they decided that every single add-on was going to need to be rewritten. It seems like it's never been treated as a priority, as shown by this tool not even being integrated with the main addons.mozilla.org site, and that makes me really worried for the future of Firefox.