You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Remark: This might be repetitive request, but I wasn't able to find this in list of existing enhancements/feature request. Please redirect me to existing ones, to vote.
Actual behavior
Currently there is no way to easily switch by one-click between containers that would simply filter out all other tabs that doesn't belong to selected container. There is only option to hide container from Container menu, which is a bit clumsy and doesn't do easy filtering functionality.
Also I would appreciate bookmarks categorization/tagging based on containers. There is no easy way to see color/container name or container icon next to bookmark or bookmark folder.
Expected behavior
To have top-level toggle button with all containers listed. By clicking given container name, all other tabs and bookmarks would be hidden.
E.g.: I would click on "work" container and only work related tabs and bookmarks would be visible (all other would be hidden).
There can be toggle option to "show all" - so all tabs of all containers would be visible, same for bookmarks.
When user switch between Container toggles, it will always show last opened tab of given container, or blank home page (if there is no opened tab of given container).
Bookmarks or bookmark folders would be easily distinguishable (by color or icon of container) to which container belong.
Notes
This toggle or filtering functionality would be really great, in order to easily switch between work related or personal stuff, which is IMHO very valid usecase for most of users.
Thanks for reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was coming here to suggest moving the "Hide this container" button to the top level of the addon's menu and stick it on each container. But this automation idea Bajger mentions would also be very useful in speeding up the user experience.
In fact, the fast hiding and showing of containers is pretty much what makes or breaks if I will adopt containers as one of my essential "must have" addons! Right now it feels very gimmicky.
dannycolin
changed the title
[Enhancement] Top level toggle for easy switching (filtering) between containters
Top level toggle for easy switching (filtering) between containters
Dec 20, 2022
dannycolin
changed the title
Top level toggle for easy switching (filtering) between containters
Show only this container option
Dec 20, 2022
Remark: This might be repetitive request, but I wasn't able to find this in list of existing enhancements/feature request. Please redirect me to existing ones, to vote.
Actual behavior
Currently there is no way to easily switch by one-click between containers that would simply filter out all other tabs that doesn't belong to selected container. There is only option to hide container from Container menu, which is a bit clumsy and doesn't do easy filtering functionality.
Also I would appreciate bookmarks categorization/tagging based on containers. There is no easy way to see color/container name or container icon next to bookmark or bookmark folder.
Expected behavior
To have top-level toggle button with all containers listed. By clicking given container name, all other tabs and bookmarks would be hidden.
E.g.: I would click on "work" container and only work related tabs and bookmarks would be visible (all other would be hidden).
There can be toggle option to "show all" - so all tabs of all containers would be visible, same for bookmarks.
When user switch between Container toggles, it will always show last opened tab of given container, or blank home page (if there is no opened tab of given container).
Bookmarks or bookmark folders would be easily distinguishable (by color or icon of container) to which container belong.
Notes
This toggle or filtering functionality would be really great, in order to easily switch between work related or personal stuff, which is IMHO very valid usecase for most of users.
Thanks for reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: