Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Defer Contact Picker API position #266
I agree with @dbaron about Marcos’s suggestion doesn’t fit with a "defer" position.
I also strongly disagree with even hinting that we might think this API is "non-harmful" when that hasn’t even been mentioned in #153 — in fact quite the opposite, I noted explicitly there that "I’m leaning towards expecting an eventual 'harmful' evaluation."
So I’m not ok with moving it into the description, and that is unnecessary for a defer position. I’d like us to be able to actually defer rather than debate more details in the description.
Re: "leaves their source unspecified", I’m ok with dropping that from the description, it’s not really an actionable criticism outside of a thorough evaluation. I’ll update the PR accordingly.
(Originally published at: https://tantek.com/2020/042/t3/)
> Why? It does a reasonable job at being privacy preserving - or did I miss something?
Please ask follow-up questions of a potential eventual "harmful" evaluation like that on #153, rather than asking here on a pull request to "defer".
I’m also requesting "us to be able to actually defer rather than debate" a specific eventual evaluation.
(Originally published at: https://tantek.com/2020/042/t4/)
I merged this as-is. On thinking further about