Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discovering patterns in 20663 individual research workflows - using data from our recent global survey. #32

Open
3 of 9 tasks
abbycabs opened this issue May 7, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@abbycabs
Copy link
Member

abbycabs commented May 7, 2016

[ Project Lead ] @bmkramer
[ GitHub Repo ] https://github.com/bmkramer/101innovations-survey-data
[ Track ] Open Data: you have data others can use and play with during the sprint
[ Level ] Intermediate
[ Timezone ] CEST

Description

How cool would it be if you could analyze the current global state of scholarly communication and research practices not only by what people say, but by their active use of certain platforms, tools and websites? Well … now you can!

The results of our 2015-2016 survey on research tool usage (http://101innovations.wordpress.com) can provide insights into current practices across various fields, research roles, countries and career stages, and can be useful for researchers interested in changing research workflows. The data also makes it possible to correlate research tool usage to stance on Open Access and Open Science, and contains over 10,000 free-text answers on what respondents consider the most important developments in scholarly communication.

The full raw and cleaned dataset of the survey (20,663 responses) is available on Zenodo (http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.49583). Quick exploration of the survey results can be done in an interactive dashboard on Silk (http://dashboard101innovations.silk.co), but many more in-depth analyses are possible. During this Mozilla Science Sprint, we intend to make a head-start with these analyses by bringing together people with expertise in numerical and textual analysis. We invite all smart people, but especially those with experience in e.g. R, Python, Google Refine, NVIVO or AtlasTI. Any and all ideas for analysis are welcome!

Scripts/analyses created during the workshop will be made publicly available for others to use and build upon.

Please note that the sprint will take place between 9:00-13:00 on both days. Participants are of course free to continue working after these hours, and online support will be given wherever possible.


Want to Contribute?

Join us at the Global Sprint June 2-3. Leave a comment in this issue to let the project lead know you're interested in contributing during #mozsprint 2016!


Note to the Project Lead

Congrats, @bmkramer! This is your official project listing for the Mozilla Science Global Sprint 2016. To confirm your submission, please complete the following:

  • Provide a GitHub repository for work and discussion on your project
  • Confirm in a comment that at least one person will be available to review and answer questions on this project from 9-5 in their timezone on both June 2 & 3.

Do you want to become a featured project? 🎉

Here are some exercises that will help your project be more inviting to new contributors. We hope you'll try to complete some of these as you prepare for #mozsprint.

If you complete all the exercises, your project will be eligible to be featured in our collection of open source science projects! Once you've finished this list, contact @acabunoc to submit your project for review.

@bmkramer
Copy link
Collaborator

bmkramer commented May 9, 2016

Hi Abigail,

  • GitHub repo: https://github.com/bmkramer/101innovations-survey-data
  • Yes, we'll be available. We stated in our description that the sprint on-site will be from 9-13 u both days, during which we'll be present in person; participants are of course free to continue working after these hours, and online support will be given wherever possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants