Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Big MPI---point-to-point functionality (MPI_Count + miscellaneous) #100

tonyskjellum opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 3 comments

Big MPI---point-to-point functionality (MPI_Count + miscellaneous) #100

tonyskjellum opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 3 comments


Copy link

@tonyskjellum tonyskjellum commented Jun 14, 2018


For 64-bit clean functionality, convenience, and symmetry, the Big MPI principles being applied in Ticket #80 to collective operations should be applied to MPI point-to-point functionality.


MPI needs to be 64-bit clean throughout.

Changes to the Text

MPI_Count will replace int for counts; support counts > 2^31

Other checks of any non-64-bit-clean features in point-to-point after review.

This ticket does not address the MPI_Rank issue; that is a separate, cross-cutting ticket.

Impact on Implementations

No current API is impacted. New _X APIs for all point-to-point operations affected will be needed.

MPI implementations will have to be 64-bit clean inside since count*extent > 2^31 is already problematic for some implementations. New APIs will have to be added and the internals of MPI will have to be 64-bit capable for buffers and related issues.

Impact on Users

Users who opt in with the new API will be able to send and receive larger messages [MPI_Count]


See also Ticket #80, #97, #98, #99

PR mpi-forum/mpi-standard#60

Copy link

@tonyskjellum tonyskjellum commented Sep 20, 2018

Here is the initial text for the pull request:


Copy link

@wesbland wesbland commented Oct 7, 2020

@tonyskjellum / @puribangalore - Is this issue replaced by #137? Can we close this?

Copy link

@puribangalore puribangalore commented Oct 7, 2020

@wesbland wesbland closed this Oct 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants