Shrink variables in mrb_vm_exec()#6318
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Introduce the `ci` variable instead and refer to it indirectly.
Can be referenced by traversing through the `irep` pointer.
Contributor
Author
Member
|
Merged. Does this mean we can close #6307 now? |
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you. |
Member
|
OK. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is commit b055fa5 and 4e7c100 in #6307.
Result of `gcc -fstack-usage` for some targets (only `mrb_vm_exec()`)
Result of `size vm.o` for some targets
Unfortunately, it does not necessarily reduce stack usage or object code size in all environments.
Nevertheless, I believe it will have a positive impact on embedded CPUs.