Add TexLive#8271
Conversation
|
nice! |
|
Why is there -bin in the package name? |
As I told I am following Archlinux here. They have the core binaries in |
|
I made https://github.com/msys2/msys2-texlive so that |
|
Looks like it's going to be hard to get things right, I don't know much about configuration, which we can copy from Arch if they had texlive 2021, maybe let's wait for that to happen. |
or configuration wont work as expected
they are wrappers which will be installed in necessary packages and it shouldn't be here.
it speeds up download time Signed-off-by: Naveen M K <naveen@syrusdark.website>
This would fix mingw32 laucher not working also update packaging detail from arch's package
I had been stupidly copying and then deleting it
or else it can't be found
|
This is pretty much ready, AFAIK. I will check for the CI run I triggered in e719cc7 and then do a local test, finally squash some commits so that this can be merged. |
|
Tested this PR locally, by downloading the artefacts and things are working, so time to clean.
|
actually executables
|
@lazka this works locally, review and merge(please squash while merging.) |
it fails for no reason and it isn't required
|
Thanks. |
|
@naveen521kk, thanks for working to make this possible! |
Bring in LaTeX. My plan is to follow Archlinux. First, this PR will add
texlive-binpackage, which in itself isn't useful. Thentexlive-coremust be added, I have no idea why Archlinux uses"https://sources.archlinux.org/other/texlive/$pkgname-$pkgver-src.zip"https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/texlive-core/trunk/PKGBUILD#L32 as a source, need to look into that. Later every collection can be added as a new package.