New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0006962: Add missing isReadOnly functions for GUI Memos and Edit fields #236

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jul 12, 2018

Conversation

Projects
4 participants
@FileEX
Contributor

FileEX commented Jul 10, 2018

Mantis Bug Tracker Issue:
#6962

guiMemoIsReadOnly & guiEditIsReadOnly

Syntax
bool guiMemoIsReadOnly(element theMemo)
bool guiEditIsReadOnly(element editField)

FileEX added some commits Jul 10, 2018

Add files via upload
Added functions 'guiMemoIsReadOnly' and 'guiEditIsReadOnly'.
Added new functions
Added new functions 'guiMemoIsReadOnly' and 'guiEditIsReadOnly'.

@qaisjp qaisjp self-requested a review Jul 10, 2018

FileEX and others added some commits Jul 10, 2018

Fixed #2
Changes in bad function.

Changes addressed

@qaisjp qaisjp merged commit 2de8d90 into multitheftauto:master Jul 12, 2018

3 checks passed

WIP ready for review
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@qaisjp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@qaisjp

qaisjp Jul 12, 2018

Member

crap, i forgot to squash merge

Member

qaisjp commented Jul 12, 2018

crap, i forgot to squash merge

@patrikjuvonen patrikjuvonen added this to In progress in release/v1.5.6 via automation Aug 7, 2018

@patrikjuvonen patrikjuvonen added this to the 1.5.6 milestone Aug 7, 2018

@patrikjuvonen patrikjuvonen moved this from In progress to Done in release/v1.5.6 Aug 7, 2018

@patrikjuvonen patrikjuvonen changed the title from 0006962: Add missing isReadOnly functions for GUI Memos and Edit fields. to 0006962: Add missing isReadOnly functions for GUI Memos and Edit fields Sep 4, 2018

@qaisjp qaisjp removed their request for review Sep 4, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment