Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Observer / Clarify rhetorical question #70

munificent opened this Issue Jan 8, 2014 · 1 comment


None yet
1 participant

munificent commented Jan 8, 2014

Sure, "Fall of a Bridge" is somehow tied to the physics engine, but do you really want to see a call to unlockFallOffBridge() right in the middle of the linear algebra in your collision resolution algorithm?

This sentence doesn't say why you don't want that (though the next paragraph clarifies). Maybe hint at the inelegance in this paragraph too?


munificent commented Feb 17, 2014

After further though, I think the current prose is OK here.

@munificent munificent closed this Feb 17, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment