You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Thanks for your work on ruby-dbus so far.
However, whilst maintaining this in Debian, I stumbled upon this: rdoc --all --line-numbers -o doc/rdoc lib --> which means that we're relying on rdoc for docs generation. The previous maintainer of the Debian package left the following comment:
Title: Documentation of the Ruby bindings for D-Bus
Author: Chris Lalancette et al.
Abstract: This API documentation is generated with RDoc from the source of
Ruby/Dbus, providing Ruby bindings for D-Bus.
However, whilst working on the Reproducible Build front, I noticed that the generation of docs using rdoc makes this gem build un-reproducibly. So I am inclined to remove the rdoc generation part altogether.
Before I do, I wanted to know where that is the correct thing to do? Or are you really using RDoc for some part of documentation generation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @mvidner,
Thanks for your work on ruby-dbus so far.
However, whilst maintaining this in Debian, I stumbled upon this:
rdoc --all --line-numbers -o doc/rdoc lib--> which means that we're relying onrdocfor docs generation. The previous maintainer of the Debian package left the following comment:However, whilst working on the Reproducible Build front, I noticed that the generation of docs using rdoc makes this gem build un-reproducibly. So I am inclined to remove the
rdocgeneration part altogether.Before I do, I wanted to know where that is the correct thing to do? Or are you really using RDoc for some part of documentation generation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: