You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On a recent mingw-users thread, a point was raised around the way headers are developed (public documentation, clean room, reverse engineering etc.) and it made me wonder about our directx patches. This:
* Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
*
* File: dinput.h
* Content: DirectInput include file
makes it seem like an unlicensed copy of Microsoft sources.
Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe I'm not qualified to have an opinion on these questions, but those headers were added to MXE a long time ago. They are probably available elsewhere these days, such as from the mingw-w64 project or Wine. We could consider simply stopping the practice of supplementing the mingw headers, which would mean dropping mingw support for a number of packages.
On a recent mingw-users thread, a point was raised around the way headers are developed (public documentation, clean room, reverse engineering etc.) and it made me wonder about our directx patches. This:
makes it seem like an unlicensed copy of Microsoft sources.
Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: