Wrong logic for handling large BLOBs? #58
Closed
Comments
Thanks agin. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Shouldn't line 204 of fbcore.py be
instead of
I'm finding that the protocol will return a 0 instead of a 1 every 507873 bytes (strange number).
As a result of this logic, my BLOB is being truncated.
I haven't been able to prove that 0 is an OK response as I can't find the spec and reading the C++ code isn't my strong suit. But changing the Python to 'n != 2' seems to work.
Your input would help a lot.
P.S: I noticed that the same logic is also found in your Go version
I've filed a similar issue there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: