Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Release asset: official Docker image #754
Description of bug:
I want to run the client inside of a docker container, keeping the blockchain, config and keys on separate volumes.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Describe the results you received:
Neither of the searches https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=nano&starCount=0 or https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=raiblocks&starCount=0 return any conclusive results.
Describe the results you expected:
Additional information you deem important (e.g. issue happens only occasionally):
Until there is a clear, correctly named, automatically built official image, there is a good opportunity for someone to upload a hacked image to the hub in order to steal peoples funds etc.
So to answer the question: yes, I think it would be reasonable to see, under the "Looking to start a node?"-section on nano.org, the link "Grab the Linux build here:" be followed by "...or run in a Docker container"
+1 the project would benefit if 'nanocurrency' user gains official status on Docker Hub.
As with all best practices on Docker Hub there should be a link to the source repository, a link to the Dockerfile used to build the image and more comprehensive description of the project.
I chose not to run that image until I read the instructions on the Milestone 11 annoucement which specifically references
Given how easy it is to change a wiki I wouldn't use that as any source of validity.
I have added a link to the wiki page in the Release V17.0 releases and we'll keep that link in the future release announcements. Since we are constantly working on this software and systems, we miss important bits of perspective on what it looks like from the outside. Thank you for helping us !