Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slightly more efficient way of storing duplicates #1364

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 2, 2019

Conversation

Projects
3 participants
@rkeene
Copy link
Contributor

commented Nov 8, 2018

TODO:

  • Write test that covers the duplication of the results from pending-only
  • Verify that the correct boolean logic is used in deduplication

@rkeene rkeene added this to the V18.0 milestone Nov 8, 2018

@rkeene rkeene self-assigned this Nov 8, 2018

@rkeene rkeene requested a review from PlasmaPower Nov 8, 2018

@rkeene rkeene removed the request for review from PlasmaPower Nov 8, 2018

@zhyatt zhyatt added this to Unscheduled in V18 Dec 27, 2018

@rkeene rkeene force-pushed the rkeene:better-bulk_pull_account-dedupe branch from 7a3cad0 to 6ceedde Dec 28, 2018

@rkeene rkeene moved this from Unscheduled to CP 1 (2018-01-09) in V18 Dec 31, 2018

@rkeene rkeene merged commit 937dad5 into nanocurrency:master Jan 2, 2019

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.