Add option to load script from a remote location

[Czaki]

References and relevant issues

napari/docs#819 (comment)
napari/docs#819 (comment)

Description

Add an option to execute a Python script in napari without needing to download it on the local machine.

[Czaki]

Requested by @TimMonko and @psobolewskiPhD. May be treated as security hole.

[TimMonko]

While of course its a security hole, I think the same caution always applies to getting remote things, so is this really a napari liability?

[Czaki]

While of course its a security hole, I think the same caution always applies to getting remote things, so is this really a napari liability?

Nope. Maybe documentation should warn about this.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.76923% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.03%. Comparing base (5c653f2) to head (6e47369).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/napari_builtins/io/_read.py	78.26%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8208      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.97%   93.03%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         658      658              
  Lines       62604    62629      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits        58208    58265      +57     
+ Misses       4396     4364      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[psobolewskiPhD]

It's pretty cool to do napari https://napari.org/stable/_downloads/8a24291ab87e35b7098a1effaa578569/3D_paths.py and run an example!
Works with the "New from Clipboard" too!!

[willingc]

I think mentioning using files from a trusted source is the most straightforward way to document this.

[willingc]

@Czaki Thanks for simplifying the test with parametrize.

I amended the other suggestion based on your comment.

[Czaki]

Updated the code and function naming.

[TimMonko]

With this will we be able to do
uvx --from 'napari[all]' napari remote_path_to_script to spin up a napari and script to show things off really fast?
https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/tools/#requesting-specific-versions

[Czaki]

I think so

[willingc]

Thanks @Czaki. Enjoy SciPy.

[willingc]

For the macos error, do we know why there is no leak graph generated?

No files were found with the provided path: ./*leak-backref-graph*.pdf. No artifacts will be uploaded.

Update Nevermind. I just remember pystack isn't supported on macos.

[imagesc-bot]

This pull request has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.image.sc/t/napari-0-6-4-release-candidate-for-testing/115732/2