New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The performance of the pretrained model you provided is somewhat different #1
Comments
Hello tfygg, I just re-ran the test on those images and I have the reported accuracies. |
Oh by the way I can send you the image list that I use for AFLW2000 by email if you want 🙂 |
Please tell me if this fixed the mismatch, also check if you're using the test_hopenet.py script to test it. Thank you! |
Ok, thanks. My email is tfy7@qq.com. |
Thank for your help. |
Dear Natanielruiz, could you also send me the image list? |
@tfygg @natanielruiz |
Dear @natanielruiz @tfygg @tangbohu ,could you send me the 1969 of the AFLW2000 image list? |
Thank you for your email. I'll disposal and reply as soon as possible.Best Regards!邹涵江
|
Hi, i tested the pretrained model (300W-LP, alpha 2) you provided on AFLW2000, and found that the performance is somewhat different from shown on the paper? is this model the best of your algorithm?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: