Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The performance of the pretrained model you provided is somewhat different #1

Closed
tfygg opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed

Comments

@tfygg
Copy link

tfygg commented Dec 1, 2017

Hi, i tested the pretrained model (300W-LP, alpha 2) you provided on AFLW2000, and found that the performance is somewhat different from shown on the paper? is this model the best of your algorithm?

image

@natanielruiz
Copy link
Owner

Hello tfygg,
Please keep in mind that since our method predicts 66 bins of 3 degrees each - the minimum and maximum degree angle that it can predict is -99 and +99. For that reason we filter our test datasets and remove images of angles higher than that. We use 1969 of the 2000 AFLW2000 images.

I just re-ran the test on those images and I have the reported accuracies.

@natanielruiz
Copy link
Owner

image

@natanielruiz
Copy link
Owner

natanielruiz commented Dec 1, 2017

Oh by the way I can send you the image list that I use for AFLW2000 by email if you want 🙂

@natanielruiz
Copy link
Owner

Please tell me if this fixed the mismatch, also check if you're using the test_hopenet.py script to test it. Thank you!

@tfygg
Copy link
Author

tfygg commented Dec 4, 2017

Ok, thanks. My email is tfy7@qq.com.
By the way, When trained the model, should i filter the datasets and remove the images?
Can you send the train list to me,please?

@tfygg
Copy link
Author

tfygg commented Dec 10, 2017

Thank for your help.
I used the image list that your provided, the accuracies is no problem.

@tangbohu
Copy link

Dear Natanielruiz, could you also send me the image list?
My email is tangbohutbh@gmail.com. Thanks a lot!

@fengziyong
Copy link

@tfygg @natanielruiz
I filtered the 300W_LP and AFLW2000 by myself. But I can't reproduce result reported by the paper.
test
I train on 300W_LP and test on AFLW200.
Settings:
python train_hopenet.py --output_string=2018-06-09_1 --data_dir=../data --filename_list=../pose_clean.list --alpha=1 --lr=0.00001 --gpu 3 --num_epochs 25

@shz0519
Copy link

shz0519 commented Dec 4, 2018

Dear @natanielruiz @tfygg @tangbohu ,could you send me the 1969 of the AFLW2000 image list?
My email is shz_0519@126.com. Thanks !

@Zouhj
Copy link

Zouhj commented Mar 4, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants