Skip to content
This repository

Authority helps you authorize actions in your Rails app. It's ORM-neutral and has very little fancy syntax; just group your models under one or more Authorizer classes and write plain Ruby methods on them.

Fetching latest commit…

Octocat-spinner-32-eaf2f5

Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time

Octocat-spinner-32 gemfiles
Octocat-spinner-32 lib
Octocat-spinner-32 spec
Octocat-spinner-32 .gitignore
Octocat-spinner-32 .rspec added rspec config March 20, 2012
Octocat-spinner-32 .rvmrc
Octocat-spinner-32 .travis.yml
Octocat-spinner-32 CHANGELOG.markdown
Octocat-spinner-32 Gemfile Update Rspec version November 27, 2012
Octocat-spinner-32 LICENSE initial commit March 09, 2012
Octocat-spinner-32 README.markdown
Octocat-spinner-32 Rakefile wire up default rake task to run rspec April 25, 2012
Octocat-spinner-32 TODO.markdown
Octocat-spinner-32 authority.gemspec
README.markdown

Authority

Authority helps you authorize actions in your Rails app. It's ORM-neutral and has very little fancy syntax; just group your models under one or more Authorizer classes and write plain Ruby methods on them.

Authority will work fine with a standalone app or a single sign-on system. You can check roles in a database or permissions in a YAML file. It doesn't care! What it does do is give you an easy way to organize your logic and handle unauthorized actions.

It requires that you already have some kind of user object in your application, accessible from all controllers and views via a method like current_user (configurable).

Build Status

Code Climate

Contents

Overview

Using Authority, you have:

  • Broad, class-level rules. Examples:
    • "Basic users cannot delete any Widget."
    • "Only admin users can create Offices."
  • Fine-grained, instance-level rules. Examples:
    • "Management users can only edit schedules with date ranges in the future."
    • "Users can't create playlists more than 20 songs long unless they've paid."
  • A clear syntax for permissions-based views. Examples:
    • link_to 'Edit Widget', edit_widget_path(@widget) if current_user.can_update?(@widget)
    • link_to 'Keelhaul Scallywag', keelhaul_scallywag_path(@scallywag) if current_user.can_keelhaul?(@scallywag)
  • Graceful handling of access violations: by default, it displays a "you can't do that" screen and logs the violation.
  • Minimal effort and mess.

Most importantly, you have total flexibility: Authority does not constrain you into using a particular scheme of roles and/or permissions.

Authority lets you control access based on:

  • Roles in your app's database (rolify makes this easy)
  • Roles in a separate, single-sign-on app
  • Users' points (like StackOverflow)
  • Time and date
  • Weather, stock prices, vowels in the user's name, or anything else you can check with Ruby

All you have to do is define the methods you need on your authorizers. You have all the flexibility of normal Ruby classes.

You make the rules; Authority enforces them.

The flow of Authority

Authority encapsulates all authorization logic in Authorizer classes. Want to do something with a model? Ask its authorizer.

Models that have the same authorization rules should use the same authorizer. In other words, if you would write the exact same methods on two models to determine who can create them, who can edit them, etc, then they should use the same authorizer.

Every model starts out assuming that its authorizer is ApplicationAuthorizer, but you can specify another one using the model's authorizer_name= method. Authorizers are just classes, so you can use any inheritance pattern you like.

Some example groupings:

     Simplest case                Logical groups                                 Most granular 

  ApplicationAuthorizer        ApplicationAuthorizer                         ApplicationAuthorizer
           +                             +                                             +
           |                    +--------+-------+                 +-------------------+-------------------+
           |                    +                +                 +                   +                   +
           |             BasicAuthorizer   AdminAuthorizer  CommentAuthorizer  ArticleAuthorizer  EditionAuthorizer
           |                    +                +                 +                   +                   +
   +-------+-------+            +-+       +------+                 |                   |                   |
   +       +       +              +       +      +                 +                   +                   +
Comment Article Edition        Comment Article Edition          Comment             Article             Edition

The authorization process generally flows like this:

               current_user.can_create?(Article)                 # You ask this question, and the user
                           +                                     # automatically asks the model...
                           |
                           v
             Article.creatable_by?(current_user)                 # The model automatically asks
                           +                                     # its authorizer...
                           |
                           v
           AdminAuthorizer.creatable_by?(current_user)           # *You define this method.*
                           +                                     # If you don't, the inherited one
                           |                                     # calls `default`...
                           v
    AdminAuthorizer.default(:creatable, current_user)            # *You define this method.* 
                                                                 # If you don't, it will use the one 
                                                                 # inherited from ApplicationAuthorizer.
                                                                 # (Its parent, Authority::Authorizer,
                                                                 # defines the method as `return false`.)

If the answer is false and the original caller was a controller, this is treated as a SecurityViolation. If it was a view, maybe you just don't show a link.

(Diagrams made with AsciiFlow)

Installation

Starting from a clean commit status, add authority to your Gemfile, bundle, then rails g authority:install.

Defining Your Abilities

Edit config/initializers/authority.rb. That file documents all your options, but one of particular interest is config.abilities, which defines the verbs and corresponding adjectives in your app. The defaults are:

config.abilities =  {
  :create => 'creatable',
  :read   => 'readable',
  :update => 'updatable',
  :delete => 'deletable'
}

This option determines what methods are added to your users, models and authorizers. If you need to ask user.can_deactivate?(Satellite) and @satellite.deactivatable_by?(user), add :deactivate => 'deactivatable' to the hash.

Wiring It Together

Users

# Whatever class represents a logged-in user in your app
class User 
  # Adds `can_create?(resource)`, etc
  include Authority::UserAbilities
...
end

Models

class Article
  # Adds `creatable_by?(user)`, etc
  include Authority::Abilities

  # Without this, 'ApplicationAuthorizer' is assumed
  self.authorizer_name = 'AdminAuthorizer'
  ...
end

Authorizers

Add your authorizers under app/authorizers, subclassing the generated ApplicationAuthorizer.

These are where your actual authorization logic goes. Here's how it works:

  • Instance methods answer questions about model instances, like "can this user update this particular widget?" (Within an instance method, you can get the model instance with resource).
    • Any instance method you don't define (for example, if you didn't make a def deletable_by?(user)) will fall back to the corresponding class method. In other words, if you haven't said whether a user can update this particular widget, we'll decide by checking whether they can update any widget.
  • Class methods answer questions about model classes, like "is it ever permissible for this user to update a Widget?"
    • Any class method you don't define (for example, if you didn't make a def self.updatable_by?(user)) will call that authorizer's default method.

For example:

# app/authorizers/schedule_authorizer.rb
class ScheduleAuthorizer < ApplicationAuthorizer
  # Class method: can this user at least sometimes create a Schedule?
  def self.creatable_by?(user)
    user.manager?
  end

  # Instance method: can this user delete this particular schedule?
  def deletable_by?(user)
    resource.in_future? && user.manager? && resource.department == user.department
  end
end

# undefined; calls `ScheduleAuthorizer.default(:updatable, user)`
ScheduleAuthorizer.updatable_by?(user) 

As you can see, you can specify different logic for every method on every model, if necessary. On the other extreme, you could simply supply a default method that covers all your use cases.

Passing Options

Any options you pass when checking permissions will be passed right up the chain. One use case for this would be if you needed an associated instance in order to do a class-level check. For example:

# I don't have a comment instance to check, but I need to know
# which post the user wants to comment on
user.can_create?(Comment, :for => @post)

This would ultimately call creatable_by? on the designated authorizer with two arguments: the user and {:for => @post}. If you've defined that method yourself, you'd need to ensure that it accepts the options hash before doing this, or you'd get a "wrong number of arguments" error.

There's nothing special about the hash key :for; I just think it reads well in this case. You can pass any options that make sense in your case.

If you don't pass options, none will be passed to your authorizer, either.

And you could always handle the case above without options if you don't mind creating an extra model instance:

user.can_create?(Comment.new(:post => @post))

Default Methods

Any class method you don't define on an authorizer will call the default method on that authorizer. This method is defined on Authority::Authorizer to simply return false. This is a 'whitelisting' approach; any permission you haven't specified (which falls back to the default method) is considered forbidden.

You can override this method in your ApplicationAuthorizer and/or per authorizer. For example, you might want one that looks up the user's roles and correlates them with permissions:

# app/authorizers/application_authorizer.rb
class ApplicationAuthorizer < Authority::Authorizer

  # Example call: `default(:creatable, current_user)`
  def self.default(able, user)
    has_role_granting?(user, able) || user.admin?
  end

  protected

  def has_role_granting(user, able)
    # Does the user have any of the roles which give this permission?
    (roles_which_grant(able) & user.roles).any?
  end

  def roles_which_grant(able)
    # Look up roles for the current authorizer and `able`
    ...
  end
end

If your system is uniform enough, this method alone might handle all the logic you need.

Testing Authorizers

One nice thing about putting your authorization logic in authorizers is the ease of testing. Here's a brief example.

# An authorizer shared by several admin-only models
describe AdminAuthorizer do

  before :each do 
    @user  = FactoryGirl.build(:user)
    @admin = FactoryGirl.build(:admin)
  end

  describe "class" do
    it "lets admins update in bulk" do
      expect(AdminAuthorizer).to be_bulk_updatable_by(@admin)
    end

    it "doesn't let users update in bulk" do
      expect(AdminAuthorizer).not_to be_bulk_updatable_by(@user)
    end
  end

  describe "instances" do

    before :each do
      # A mock model that uses AdminAuthorizer
      @admin_resource_instance = mock_admin_resource
    end

    it "lets admins delete" do
      expect(@admin_resource_instance.authorizer).to be_deletable_by(@admin)
    end

    it "doesn't let users delete" do
      expect(@admin_resource_instance.authorizer).not_to be_deletable_by(@user)
    end

  end

end

Controllers

Anytime a controller finds a user attempting something they're not authorized to do, a Security Violation will result. Controllers get two ways to check authorization:

  • authorize_actions_for Llama protects multiple controller actions with a before_filter, which performs a class-level check. If the current user is never allowed to delete a Llama, they'll never even get to the controller's destroy method.
  • authorize_action_for @llama can be called inside a single controller action, and performs an instance-level check. If called inside update, it will check whether the current user is allowed to update this particular @llama instance.

How does Authority know to check deletable_by? before the controller's destroy action? It checks your configuration. These mappings are configurable globally from the initializer file. Defaults are as follows:

config.controller_action_map = {
 :index   => 'read',    # `index` controller action will check `readable_by?`
 :show    => 'read',
 :new     => 'create',  # `new` controller action will check `creatable_by?`
 :create  => 'create',  # ...etc
 :edit    => 'update',
 :update  => 'update',
 :destroy => 'delete'
}

They are also configurable per controller, as follows:

class LlamasController < ApplicationController

  # Check class-level authorizations before all actions except :create
  # Also, to authorize this controller's 'neuter' action, ask whether `current_user.can_update?(Llama)`
  authorize_actions_for Llama, :except => :create, :actions => {:neuter => :update},

  # To authorize this controller's 'breed' action, ask whether `current_user.can_create?(Llama)`
  # To authorize its 'vaporize' action, ask whether `current_user.can_delete?(Llama)`
  authority_actions :breed => 'create', :vaporize => 'delete'

  ...

  def edit
    @llama = Llama.find(params[:id])
    authorize_action_for(@llama)        # Check to see if you're allowed to edit this llama. failure == SecurityViolation    
  end

  def update
    @llama = Llama.find(params[:id])
    authorize_action_for(@llama)        # Check to see if you're allowed to edit this llama.
    @llama.attributes = params[:llama]  # Don't save the attributes before authorizing
    authorize_action_for(@llama)        # Check again, to see if the changes are allowed.
    if @llama.save?
    # etc
  end

end

As with other authorization checks, you can also pass options here, and they'll be sent along to your authorization method: authorize_action_for(@llama, :sporting => @hat_style). Generally, though, your authorization will depend on some attribute or association of the model instance, so the authorizer can check @llama.neck_strength and @llama.owner.nationality, etc, without needing any additional information.

Views

Assuming your user object is available in your views, you can do all kinds of conditional rendering. For example:

link_to 'Edit Widget', edit_widget_path(@widget) if current_user.can_update?(@widget)

If the user isn't allowed to edit widgets, they won't see the link. If they're nosy and try to hit the URL directly, they'll get a Security Violation from the controller.

The Generic can?

Authority is organized around protecting resources. But occasionally you may need to authorize something that has no particular resource. For that, it provides the generic can? method. It works like this:

  current_user.can?(:view_stats_dashboard) # calls `ApplicationAuthorizer.can_view_stats_dashboard?`

Use this very sparingly, and consider it a code smell. Overuse will turn your ApplicationAuthorizer into a junk drawer of methods. Ask yourself, "am I sure I don't have a resource for this? Should I have one?"

Security Violations & Logging

Anytime a user attempts an unauthorized action, Authority calls whatever controller method is specified by your security_violation_handler option, handing it the exception. The default handler is authority_forbidden, which Authority adds to your ApplicationController. It does the following:

  • Renders public/403.html
  • Logs the violation to whatever logger you configured.

You can define your own authority_forbidden method:

# Send 'em back where they came from with a slap on the wrist
def authority_forbidden(exception)
  Authority.configuration.logger.warn(error.message)
  redirect_to request.referrer.presence || root_path, :alert => 'You are not authorized to complete that action.'
end

... or specify a different handler like this:

# config/initializers/authority.rb
config.security_violation_handler = :fire_ze_missiles

Then define the method on your controller:

# app/controllers/application_controller.rb
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base

  def fire_ze_missiles(exception)
    # Log? Set a flash message? Dispatch minions to 
    # fill their mailbox with goose droppings? It's up to you.
  end
...
end

If you want different error handling per controller, define fire_ze_missiles on each of them.

Your method will be handed the SecurityViolation, which has a message method. In case you want to build your own message, it also exposes user, action and resource.

Credits, AKA 'Shout-Outs'

  • adamhunter for pairing with me on this gem. The only thing faster than his typing is his brain.
  • nkallen for writing a lovely blog post on access control when he worked at Pivotal Labs. I cried sweet tears of joy when I read that a couple of years ago. I was like, "Zee access code, she is so BEEUTY-FUL!"
  • jnunemaker for later creating Canable, another inspiration for Authority.
  • TMA for employing me and letting me open source some of our code.

Responses, AKA 'Hollaback'

Do you like Authority? Has it cleaned up your code, made you more personable, and taught you the Secret to True Happiness? Awesome! I'd love to get email from you - see my Github profile for the address.

Contributing

How can you contribute? Let me count the ways.

1. Publicity

If you like Authority, tell people! Blog, tweet, comment, or even... [shudder]... talk with people in person. If you feel up to it, I mean. It's OK if you don't.

2. Documentation

Add examples to the wiki to help others solve problems like yours.

3. Issues

Tell me your problems and/or ideas.

4. Code or documentation

  1. Have an idea. If you don't have one, check the TODO file or grep the project for 'TODO' comments.
  2. Open an issue so we can talk it over.
  3. Fork this project
  4. Create your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)
  5. bundle install to get all dependencies
  6. rspec spec to run all tests.
  7. Update/add tests for your changes and code until they pass.
  8. Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Added some feature')
  9. Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)
  10. Create a new Pull Request
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.