We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Originally reported by Anonymous
Hi
I found that coveralls can't process files which have both the emacs and vim style fileencoding specifiers are given at the top of a file.
# -*- coding:utf-8 -*- # vim: fileencoding=utf-8
I created a gist that reproduces the problem. You can run it with
nosetests test_example.py --with-coverage --cover-package=exampl
This will result in an error like this.
example.py NotPython: Couldn't parse '/home/max/Desktop/coverage-test/example.py' as Python source: 'encoding declaration in Unicode string' at line 0
According to PEP 0263 both are OK but it doesn't say anything about giving both forms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Finish up Max Linke's fix for double encoding declarations. Fixes #453
→ <<cset 3d74bc2d93c1 (bb)>>
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixed in 3d74bc2d93c1 (bb)
No branches or pull requests
Originally reported by Anonymous
Hi
I found that coveralls can't process files which have both the emacs and vim style fileencoding specifiers are given at the top of a file.
I created a gist that reproduces the problem. You can run it with
This will result in an error like this.
According to PEP 0263 both are OK but it
doesn't say anything about giving both forms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: