Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release lock client in KTI #6075

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 14, 2015
Merged

Release lock client in KTI #6075

merged 2 commits into from Dec 14, 2015

Conversation

lutovich
Copy link
Contributor

KernelTransactionImplementation doesn't reference Locks.Client since those instances are hard wired to a specific Locks instance. Other similar references are always kept on the service level, like CommitProcess, where there's a proxy in between which switches when role switches.

This commit undos parts of #5817 because of the issue described in #5996 and because this solution where Locks is referenced conforms with other types of references and is a simpler fix to the original problem.

NOTE: merge of this PR to 3.0 should be a null-merge.

tinwelint and others added 2 commits December 10, 2015 23:53
since those instances are hard wired to a specific Locks instance. Other
similar references are always kept on the service level, like
CommitProcess, where there's a proxy in between which switches when role
switches.

This commit undos parts of #5817 because of the issue described in #5996
and because this solution where Locks is referenced conforms with
other types of references and is a simpler fix to the original problem.
@lutovich
Copy link
Contributor Author

HA-robustness test for this branch is green. Thus NOT READY FOR MERGE is removed.

@MishaDemianenko
Copy link
Contributor

@lutovich @tinwelint PR looks fine

MishaDemianenko added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2015
@MishaDemianenko MishaDemianenko merged commit 12a62ef into neo4j:2.2 Dec 14, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants