Branch: master
Find file Copy path
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
58 lines (41 sloc) 1.78 KB

Maintaining the Neovim project

Notes on maintaining the Neovim project.

See also:

General guidelines

  • Decide by cost-benefit
  • Write down what was decided
  • Constraints are good
  • Use automation to solve problems
  • Never break the API

Ticket Triage

In practice we haven't found a meaningful way to forecast more precisely than "next" and "after next". That means there are usually one or two (at most) planned milestones:

  • Next bugfix-release (1.0.x)
  • Next feature-release (1.x.0)

The forecasting problem might be solved with an explicit priority system (like Bram's todo.txt). Meanwhile the Neovim priority system is defined by:

  • PRs nearing completion (RDY).
  • Issue labels. E.g. the +plan label increases the ticket's priority merely for having a plan written down: it is closer to completion than tickets without a plan.
  • Comment activity or new information.

Anything that isn't in the next milestone, and doesn't have a RDY PR ... is just not something you care very much about, by construction. Post-release you can review open issues, but chances are your next milestone is already getting full :)

Release Policy

Release "often", but not "early".

The (unreleased) master branch is the "early" channel; it should not be released if it's not stable. Medium-risk changes may be merged to master if the next feature-release is not imminent.

For maintenance releases, create a release-x.y branch. If the current stable release has a major bug:

  1. Fix the bug on master.
  2. Cherry-pick the fix to release-x.y.
  3. Cut a release from release-x.y (run scripts/

See also: