-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: use neovim/unibilium fork #10302
Comments
I did not, yet, so forge away. I'd like to be on the team for that repo, though.
I don't think that's necessary. It's still unibilium, just with active maintenance. If it were being rewritten or something, I could see the rename. However, I'm pretty sure we're just trying to keep it alive and address issues that come up. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The neovim/unibilium fork is now the "upstream" until further notice. neovim/neovim#10302
|
Closing, only #9094 is missing - which is tracked therein itself. |
Main maintainer doesn't answer. Neovim is now the upstream see neovim/neovim#10302
Main maintainer doesn't answer. Neovim is now the upstream see neovim/neovim#10302
Main maintainer doesn't answer. Neovim is now the upstream see neovim/neovim#10302 (cherry picked from commit a3a0f1f)
TODO:
third-party/CMakeLists.txtRef: mauke/unibilium#36 (comment)
/cc @mauke
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: