docs(recipes): rewrite suites recipe, reference unit unit testing docs #3351
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
The existing recipe does not accurately reflect the current state of the library. Suites has matured significantly, and the documentation needed a rewrite to represent the library capabilities more accurately. The previous version used overly complex examples, lacked clarity, and did not provide sufficient context on when to use suites versus other testing approaches.
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
This pull request rewrites the recipe to accurately reflect the current state of the library.
TestBed.solitary()andTestBed.sociable()patternsTest.createTestingModule()with clear guidance on when to use each/content/fundamentals/unit-testing.md(auto mocking section)createMockfrom@golevelup/ts-jestas a parallel alternativeAdded a cross reference in
/content/fundamentals/unit-testing.md(auto mocking section) that mentions Suites as an alternative for focused unit testing with automatic mock generationDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?