Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add TypeScript rules #230

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Oct 1, 2021
Merged

feat: add TypeScript rules #230

merged 5 commits into from Oct 1, 2021

Conversation

eduardoboucas
Copy link
Member

Adjust the ESLint config to add TypeScript support to our projects.

@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas added the type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality label Jun 11, 2021
.eslintrc.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@netlify-team-account-1
Copy link
Contributor

Released 08b75ac to @netlify/eslint-config-node@3.2.10-prerelease-230-1

@netlify-team-account-1
Copy link
Contributor

tried out the prerelease with via netlify/build#3676 and netlify/cli#3431, both are green :)

@eduardoboucas
Copy link
Member Author

tried out the prerelease with via netlify/build#3676 and netlify/cli#3431, both are green :)

This is great! I think we're close to getting this merged.

I see that there's one comment we haven't addressed. @netlify-team-account-1 do you mind having a look at it and seeing if this something we want to add?

@ehmicky I've re-requested your review because the PR has been open for a while and I want to make sure you're still happy with this before we pull the trigger.

Co-authored-by: Matt Kane <matt.kane@netlify.com>
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit f995360 into main Oct 1, 2021
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feat/typescript branch October 1, 2021 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants