Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update dependency babel-eslint to v10 #1143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 26, 2018
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 26, 2018

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change References
babel-eslint dependencies major ^9.0.0 -> ^10.0.0 source

Release Notes

babel/babel-eslint

v10.0.0

Compare Source

v10.0.0

Small breaking change: add a peerDependency starting from the ESLint version that added a parser feature that we were monkeypatching before (and drop that code). If already using ESLint 5 shouldn't be any different.

/* @​flow */
type Node<T> = { head: T; tail: Node<T> }

// or 

type File = {chunks: Array<Chunk>}
type Chunk = {file: File}
  • Update to test against ESLint 5, add a peerDependency: #​689
  • Drop monkeypatching behavior: #​690

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: No schedule defined.

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Renovate will regenerate this PR any time it develops a merge conflict.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@edmorley edmorley added this to the v9 milestone Sep 26, 2018
@edmorley edmorley added the bug label Sep 26, 2018
Copy link
Member

@edmorley edmorley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't a breaking change for us, since we already have a peerDep on a newer ESLint than the range they've added.

@edmorley edmorley merged commit d34af98 into master Sep 26, 2018
@edmorley edmorley deleted the renovate/babel-eslint-10.x branch September 26, 2018 21:04
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants