Simplify implementation for Prisma Client #5886
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The current implementation is quite complex and unnecessary. This alternative implementation simplifies the implementation and removes the need for a separate client file.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
The separate client file and the logic within is necessary for development purposes though. Otherwise new prisma instances get created unnecessarily all the time. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
☕️ Reasoning
The current implementation is quite complex and unnecessary for beginners.
This alternative solution simplifies the implementation and removes the need for a separate client file.
🧢 Checklist
🎫 Affected issues
Please scout and link issues that might be solved by this PR.
Fixes: INSERT_ISSUE_LINK_HERE
📌 Resources