You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Presently, multiregion mesh cellzones in baraMesh are defined by using material points, it is not convenient to define many small cellzone regions. I think snappHexMesh has "cellZone inside" feature without using material points, if it can be added in baraMesh, it may be quite useful for "CHT" cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @WangLei1478,
In snappyHexMesh, "cellZone inside" can only be used for a special case where the region is defined by only one closed face.
Even in that case, the surface should be designated for each region.
As a result, it just replaces specifying points with specifying surfaces.
Of course, I understand current method to specify a point is not the best UI for it.
There is a room for improving it, and we have plan for it.
By the way, it would be helpful for me to think about better UI if you can share your case - with many small cell regions.
Thank you.
Presently, multiregion mesh cellzones in baraMesh are defined by using material points, it is not convenient to define many small cellzone regions. I think snappHexMesh has "cellZone inside" feature without using material points, if it can be added in baraMesh, it may be quite useful for "CHT" cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: