New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: PEP8 in utils #959

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 18, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@manu-tej
Contributor

manu-tej commented Mar 1, 2016

issue #889 is fixed

@manu-tej manu-tej changed the title from PEP8 fixes in utils to FIX: PEP8 in utils Mar 2, 2016

@manu-tej

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

manu-tej commented Mar 3, 2016

@arokem Completed making different PRs for different files.

@@ -62,7 +63,8 @@ def optional_package(name, trip_msg=None):
>>> pkg.some_function() #doctest: +IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TripWireError: We need package not_a_package for these functions, but ``import not_a_package`` raised an ImportError
TripWireError: We need package not_a_package for these functions, but
``import not_a_package`` raised an ImportError

This comment has been minimized.

@arokem

arokem Mar 7, 2016

Member

This should still be on one line. It's the expected output in the Python process.

@arokem

This comment has been minimized.

Member

arokem commented Mar 7, 2016

Just one small comment. Other than that - looks good!

arokem added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2016

@arokem arokem merged commit 0a7a89f into nipy:master Mar 18, 2016

@arokem arokem referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2016

Closed

PEP8 in utils #889

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment