nixxquality
committed
- +1 −1 MainForm.Designer.cs
- +3 −3 Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
- +2 −2 README.md
| @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ | ||
| // General Information about an assembly is controlled through the following | ||
| // set of attributes. Change these attribute values to modify the information | ||
| // associated with an assembly. | ||
| -[assembly: AssemblyTitle("WebM for Retards")] | ||
| +[assembly: AssemblyTitle("WebM for Gits")] | ||
| [assembly: AssemblyDescription("")] | ||
| [assembly: AssemblyConfiguration("")] | ||
| [assembly: AssemblyCompany("")] | ||
| -[assembly: AssemblyProduct("WebM for Retards")] | ||
| +[assembly: AssemblyProduct("WebM for Gits")] | ||
lolzballs
|
||
| [assembly: AssemblyCopyright("Copyright © 2014")] | ||
| [assembly: AssemblyTrademark("")] | ||
| [assembly: AssemblyCulture("")] | ||
| @@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ | ||
| // You can specify all the values or you can default the Build and Revision Numbers | ||
| // by using the '*' as shown below: | ||
| // [assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.0.*")] | ||
| -[assembly: AssemblyVersion("2.18.0")] | ||
| +[assembly: AssemblyVersion("2.18.1")] | ||
445 comments
on commit c1ac0ba
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 5, 2015
|
Poor baby Gators, empathy is hard :(
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Chris Cummings ***@***.*** wrote:
@daveryder https://github.com/daveryder
Here's the problem. People only have some much time/energy/what-have-you
for "stuff" outside their wheelhouse.
If whatever the pet issue is isn't relevant to you, more and more it just
feels like noise. This is going to sound harsh but it is what it is; other
people don't have time for the never ending cavalcade of other people's
problems.
This isn't to say people should go around shouting slurs just because. Or
that no one should make an effort to sympathize/empathize with others. What
I'm saying is making big issues over small things has this tendency to
delegitimize everything that's coming after it. Right, wrong, or
indifferent.
If you want anyone to care about what you care about you have to 1) tailor
it to your audience and 2) be very selective because the time of patience
of others is VERY limited.
That said, I feel for you.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12546918
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 5, 2015
|
Fairly sure it was Gator repos that got banned.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Arthur Kay notifications@github.com
wrote:
Piss off Ghazi, you're not welcome here.
---- On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:29:08 -0700 ***@***.*** wrote
----Poor baby Gators, empathy is hard :(
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Chris Cummings ***@***.***
wrote:
> @daveryder https://github.com/daveryder
>
> Here's the problem. People only have some much time/energy/what-have-you
> for "stuff" outside their wheelhouse.
>
> If whatever the pet issue is isn't relevant to you, more and more it just
> feels like noise. This is going to sound harsh but it is what it is;
> other
> people don't have time for the never ending cavalcade of other people's
> problems.
>
> This isn't to say people should go around shouting slurs just because. Or
> that no one should make an effort to sympathize/empathize with others.
> What
> I'm saying is making big issues over small things has this tendency to
> delegitimize everything that's coming after it. Right, wrong, or
> indifferent.
>
> If you want anyone to care about what you care about you have to 1)
> tailor
> it to your audience and 2) be very selective because the time of patience
> of others is VERY limited.
>
> That said, I feel for you.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <
> c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12546918
>
> .
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
—Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12546993
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
smeezekitty
replied
Aug 5, 2015
You're right. I would be offended by that.
However, this has absolutely nothing to do with GitHUB decision. Using the word jokingly (like the "for dummies" series) is vastly different than using the word directly to refer to a mentally challenged person.
You are stretching that extremely far |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 5, 2015
|
I was here first. |
jmendeth
replied
Aug 5, 2015
I understand you, I've been in a similar position. But it just takes a bit of maturity to understand that the word "retard" is being used with the same sense as i.e. "dummy". They are not trying to make fun of actual retarded people, so why should they get offended by that? |
smeezekitty
replied
Aug 5, 2015
|
You sound like a small child crying and stomping his feet. |
joepie91
replied
Aug 5, 2015
Context matters. If such an event drives you to take issue with every use of the word, regardless of context, then that speaks of your own personal bias - not the inappropriateness of others. Such bias is understandable, but not a good advisor for rational decisionmaking. The situation you sketched really has nothing to do with this incident, and there's no plausible evidence that insulting use of a word is encouraged by it being used in a facetious manner - quite the opposite, in fact. The facetious use is derived from the insulting use, and really only serves to weaken the effectiveness of it as an insult (as the word is not taken seriously anymore). |
davispuh
replied
Aug 5, 2015
|
LOL @daveryder looks like you don't understand what the issue is and basically your whole post is about completely different issues. And honestly I don't agree with your idea.
How's that relevant? How those other kids are related to a website? Also by the way IMO that's a bad parenting and a stupid answer as you would be lying to your own retarded kid by saying he's not retard when he actually is. Better answer would be to tell him to ignore it. Don't you realize that you're overprotective and you will never be able to always help him anyway? And it doesn't matter what word is used as there are millions of ways to insult and make someone offended.
And, what if I am? What you gonna do? Maybe I don't have any love, compassion, empathy, etc.
If only that would be so easy, but you can keep trying all you want, I don't care and I really don't agree with that idea that some words on a website would make some child miserable.
Jeez, that's a bad argument, do you really believe that creates bullying? And basically by your logic you're saying websites should remove "bad" words and somehow that will change that uncle to stop using those words, WTF?
Do you know that kids also cry when they don't get candy they want and will scream all over the shop? It really sounds like you're not a good parent and that you'll try to change world just to indulge your kids on their whim. People like you are reason why there's such spoiled kids who can't do anything themselves. |
chriscummings
replied
Aug 5, 2015
|
Perhaps instead of worrying about individual words, Github should have just made it easy to ignore/block/shadow-ban people. Seems like a far more likely solution to the "mean people problem." Meanwhile, you have @krainboltgreene apparently leading the parade, holding the banner of peace and goodwill. Wait, no, he's an insipid troll. Ah... well, that is what always seems to happen. Every. Time. Kudos! |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@arthurkay I think @krainboltgreene is more than welcome here. As much as I do not agree with his opinion on twitter, it is just his own opinion on twitter, and it is not a reason to shut him up. Just because you don't agree with his opinion. Besides, if you do not agree with his opinion, and think it is morally incorrect, why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong. Don't forget, gay/transgender community has not been listened too, and suppressed just because everyone thought that this people has no right to talk. |
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
what if he does not care? can you call him names then? |
joepie91
replied
Aug 6, 2015
A number of people have tried that throughout the course of this thread (ctrl+F 'krainboltgreene'), and he has consistently ignored such explanations, and blindly repeated his statements. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@makc @joepie91 Then lets buy our self a lolly and give up. Life tends to fix things like this, and I am good example. I never was anti-transgender, but I did offended once some with a bad joke, and I did learn the consequences. But nobody kicked me, and so it is apply to @krainboltgreene. If we want to be effective as developer community we need to be constructive to our decisions in development, and communication. Any bulling within our community should be suppressed, but not the disagreement in opinions. And if we will start to bitch around about "Oh he said that, and he said that" then we are missing the point. If @krainboltgreene will abuse someone directly, then action should be taken. Otherwise it his own opinion. Another thing I found is that people tend to try change people opinion about something by force rather then reasoning, like
So I think @krainboltgreene have exactly same right as anyone in this community, and saying him to leave the thread is just childish. |
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@herrniemand you are not consistent,
why? are you the police? if somebody abuses someone, but makes good security hole fix to your project, would you not merge his fix? maybe you mean indirect action, such as reporting the abuse. then it's fine, and if by deleting his account they delete his contribution too, this is unfortunate, but at least you are not the one to blame for it.
oh please. other people may actually listen to him and act. and you will be like "oh he did not put jews in the oven, he only said he thinks we need to"? |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@makc by the action I mean action about the abuse. Deleting account does not help anyone. And I meant the community, the project maintainers, not me. Now about opinion. It is his own opinion. You are free to criticise it. But "kick him out of maintainers because he writes on twitter something homophobic/antitransgender" is sound exactly the same to as "Jews execution(May theirs souls find their peace) during WW2" and "Stalin political repressions". Remember when crowd burned Scientists? Well lets not burn anyone, and just teach people to respect each other, rather then bitching around. |
joepie91
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@herrniemand I feel like your comments should be directed primarily at @krainboltgreene, not at those criticizing him. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@joepie91 my comments are directed to the community as whole. We are so concerned about what people say, rather they do and what they can do, that we are simply happy to remove developer because his opinion is wrong. We stopped being able to accept criticism from others, and we are happy to use rules that were made for good, for the removing people that are offending us. As I said before: I do not agree with @krainboltgreene opinion. But I am neither agree with "Piss off Ghazi, you're not welcome here.". If you think that you are better then @krainboltgreene, then maybe you should act like that. |
joepie91
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@herrniemand I'm not arguing that @krainboltgreene should be removed. My point is that he started out with the exclusionary "go away" behaviour (repeatedly), and others have simply been dishing out the same in return. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@joepie91 yea, I know. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@joepie91 I guess I just generally went out about the fact that people want other people to be gone and used @krainboltgreene as example. |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
why? are you the police? if somebody abuses someone, but makes good
security hole fix to your, would you not merge his fix?
I'll answer this one directly since I've had to do this a few times: No.
You are not the only developer in the entire world who can fix that
problem. There are enough not-assholes to ignore the "contributions" from
the assholes. This bullshit scenario also (unsurprisingly) ignores the
_cost_ of having that asshole around, namely driving off good people.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Ackermann Yuriy ***@***.*** wrote:
@joepie91 https://github.com/joepie91 I guess I just generally went out
about the fact that people want other people to be gone and used
@krainboltgreene https://github.com/krainboltgreene as example.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12561667
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
but "kick him out of maintainers because he writes on twitter something
homophobic/antitransgender" is sound exactly the same to as "Jews
execution(May theirs souls find their peace) during WW2" and "Stalin
political repressions".
Holy shit are you serious? Like, why would you ever write this in a public
place? No one should consider this a sane comparison. _No one_.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene <
me@kurtisrainboltgreene.name> wrote:
> why? are you the police? if somebody abuses someone, but makes good
> security hole fix to your, would you not merge his fix?
I'll answer this one directly since I've had to do this a few times: No.
You are not the only developer in the entire world who can fix that
problem. There are enough not-assholes to ignore the "contributions" from
the assholes. This bullshit scenario also (unsurprisingly) ignores the
_cost_ of having that asshole around, namely driving off good people.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Ackermann Yuriy ***@***.***
wrote:
> @joepie91 https://github.com/joepie91 I guess I just generally went
> out about the fact that people want other people to be gone and used
> @krainboltgreene https://github.com/krainboltgreene as example.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12561667
> .
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@krainboltgreene well. I guess it was not he most nice comparison. But it was equally bad reply as "oh he did not put jews in the oven, he only said he thinks we need to". From another view point it is conceptually the same. You trying to get rid of "morally incompatible people". It is physical in dictature, or verbally on github. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@krainboltgreene but yea. It went a bit wrong. |
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
yeah but the fix is there, and you opt to punish your software users for the sins of the contributer. this is retarded. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@makc what? |
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@herrniemand read few posts above. in that somewhat imaginary scenario users are punished by having to run the software with security hole unpatched for some extra time because maintainer dislikes the contributor. |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@makc oh. Sorry. Misunderstanding. Yes. That what I was talking about. |
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
Seriously, accepting contributions from bad, in your opinion, people is not the big deal. If you could use nazi rocket scientists to get to the moon, would you? If you could get blood transfusion from serial killer to save your own life, would you? Hell, you have no problem picking up the loot from your enemies in the video games. The examples are countless. But no, the software development is completely different business. |
jmendeth
replied
Aug 6, 2015
Nailed it. |
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
|
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
I think having you people on github is punishing to users.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Ackermann Yuriy ***@***.*** wrote:
@makc https://github.com/makc oh. Sorry. Misunderstanding. Yes. That
what I was talking about.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12562972
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
and by "you people" you mean "whoever @krainboltgreene does not like", right? |
davispuh
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
I have no words to tell how much I hate these SJWs and other "thought/morale police" and they're infesting everything, Reddit, GitHub, etc, I guess it's just matter of time till only way for sane people will be websites on Tor hidden services. |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
"Ethics".
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Dāvis ***@***.*** wrote:
I have no words to tell how much I hate these SJWs and other
"thought/morale police" and they're infesting everything, Reddit, GitHub,
etc, I guess it's just matter of time till only way for sane people will be
websites on Tor hidden services.
If code is good, I will accept commits from mass murders, ISIS, rapists,
serial killers whatever, I don't care, it's irrelevant to the code.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12564785
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
makc
replied
Aug 6, 2015
maybe not fro NSA, though. who knows, they might be planting back doors there. |
davispuh
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@krainboltgreene what ethics? I don't see there anything unethical, code is code and if it solves a problem it doesn't matter who wrote it.
@makc how do you know that contributor who sent you a PR isn't from NSA? and do you think others like China wouldn't want backdoors too? Anyway I think I'll better stop posting here. |
jmendeth
replied
Aug 6, 2015
TIL that innocent ASCII characters have ethics attached. Wow. |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
Yeah, go ahead and explain to me how it's ethical to (theoretically) work
with ISIS. Pleeeeeeease.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Xavier Mendez ***@***.*** wrote:
"Ethics".
TIL that innocent ASCII characters have ethics attached. Wow.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12565875
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
jmendeth
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
You are not working with ISIS by merging some patches into your project, even if those patches are written by ISIS, because the code is supposedly under a FOSS license and has no owner. Whoever wrote the patches, it has the same effect on your project. |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
"Ethics"
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Xavier Mendez ***@***.*** wrote:
You are not working with ISIS by merging some patches into your project,
even if those patches are written by ISIS, because the code is supposedly
under a FOSS license and has no owner. Whoever wrote the patches, it has
the same effect on your project.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12567947
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
davispuh
replied
Aug 6, 2015
@krainboltgreene okay, but only this time and I know you're such a troll. I mentioned several groups like mass murders, etc. but you're only interested in ISIS? Nazis killed more people and I would accept their commits too but all you care is ISIS this, ISIS that. Okay so do you know that doctors/physicians are obligated to abide by Declaration of Geneva (like Hippocratic Oath) and there's a point
So they are obligated to help everyone, even ISIS. If a member of ISIS is about to die in their hospital they'll do whatever they can to save him. And this in fact is ethical, while not saving would be unethical. You're saying I should discriminate people (eg. like ISIS) but I won't discriminate anyone, same as a doctor wouldn't discriminate anyone. |
jmendeth
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
@krainboltgreene Your trolling strategy needs some refinement. Try actually making arguments from time to time instead of repeating ad-hominem, vague statements and insults. |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
"Ethics"
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Xavier Mendez ***@***.*** wrote:
@krainboltgreene https://github.com/krainboltgreene Your trolling
strategy needs some refinement. Try actually making arguments from time to
time instead of repeating ad-hominem, vague statements and insults.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
c1ac0ba#commitcomment-12568042
.
##
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker
Software Developer
1631 8th St.
New Orleans, LA
70115
|
smeezekitty
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
Fingers in your ears "lalalalala" |
Faiz7412
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
Don't ask github to be cool about it. As someone who's had a fever in the past 6 months, being asked if I'm "cool" with something makes me feel personally attacked. |
onodera-punpun
replied
Aug 6, 2015
|
I like how you literally just keep posting rants without responding to anyone, for example @j-pb who says he has an actual disability, I'll quote if for you.
|
emente
replied
Aug 7, 2015
|
Rick: Cute. Your sister's boss gave me a microscope that would have made me retarded. |
Faiz7412
replied
Aug 7, 2015
|
^ continued.. |
lukaseder
replied
Aug 9, 2015
|
Suis-je déjà en retard pour cette discussion? |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 9, 2015
|
@lukaseder Oui! *) |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 9, 2015
|
Post-scriptum: Ban est en attente pour vous ... ... et tous les francophones .... |
lukaseder
replied
Aug 9, 2015
|
Ici gît donc le bon sens |
herrjemand
replied
Aug 9, 2015
|
@lukaseder Absurde je ne vois que! |
krainboltgreene
replied
Aug 9, 2015
|
That face when you find out Gitlab also has a code of conduct (an even better one than Github's TODO choice): https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md Hahahaha. Sucks to be assholes. |
fbt
replied
Aug 10, 2015
|
That code of conduct has nothing to do with self-hosted gitlab instances. Edit: it's also not retarded, as far as I can see. |
jgrigonis
replied
Aug 10, 2015
|
"Sucks to be assholes."
Guess who would know.
…
|
cmdrkotori
replied
Aug 10, 2015
|
@krainboltgreene You know what the real burning question on everyone's mind is? Are including in a terms of service any discriminatory terms that limit the ability of consumers to enter the market an abuse of Market Power, which is illegal in some jurisdictions? Github is in fact not allowed to reserve the right to "refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time" under the law. For instance, under the Civil Rights Act it may not refuse to host repos on the basis of race, religion, age, sex, etc. This is far from "for any reason". Gitlab is much better in this respect than the laughable Code of Conduct that Github endorses. And speaking of the Civil Rights Act, "Webm for retards" works rather nice with the principle of affirmative action. Ergo, taking down the repo was actually discriminating against the mentally disabled rather than helping them because its use enables awareness of the disabled which in fact was mentioned earlier in the thread. Therefore no law is broken by allowing the use of "retard" in this case. Now as far as removing content based on the grounds of harassing, insulting behaviour: it is best left for a court to decide if a particular piece of content constitutes harassing or insulting behaviour, because hosting something despite setting yourself up for having a policy of taking said content down exposes Github to the liability of failing to remove content wrt the law should someone die for instance having to explain to a committee why didn't you put the proverbial fire out sooner since you've done so with other repos. Therefore operating under the common carrier and public space provisions of the law and going the way of "the best code of conduct is no code of conduct" (aka less is more) route would have been much safer than Github's current practice of indiscriminate takedowns and get this is actually closer to other parts of its terms of service such as "You shall defend GitHub against any claim, demand, suit or proceeding made or brought against GitHub by a third-party alleging that Your Content, or Your use of the Service in violation of this Agreement" which place the burden on users rather than Github as being responsible for content. But of course since Github now wants to do the opposite of the weightier legal parts of its terms of service by placing more weight on the "General Conditions" section than the "Content Ownership" section, then we the users are not going to be the only ones responsible for anything that happens which is likely not what Github would want. Overall this trend of censorship in the public space by private corporations is rather dumb. |
onodera-punpun
replied
Aug 11, 2015
|
Gitlabs coc doesn't have a section about how "reverse -ism" don't exist (aka "I'm a racist and/or sexist, but I don't want to be called a racist/sexist so I redefine words), and githubs to-be coc hopefully won't either: https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/84 |
domgetter
replied
Aug 12, 2015
|
@krainboltgreene You don't get to sit on your moral high horse yelling "ethics" and simultaneously call people "assholes" that disagree with you. Perhaps you should spend some time attempting to come to a consistent and reasonable position. |
Faiz7412
replied
Aug 13, 2015
|
Everyone, let's settle the debate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb2mVGE63YU |
dandv
replied
Sep 2, 2015
|
Hey @github, how about censoring all repos that show up at http://www.commitlogsfromlastnight.com/ ? |
ticki
replied
Jan 22, 2016
|
This thread reads like 4chan. |
RevanProdigalKnight
replied
Jan 22, 2016
|
Wow guys, way to necro a thread. |
jmendeth
replied
Jan 22, 2016
|
I wonder if there's any commit with more comments than this one. |
fbt
replied
Jan 22, 2016
It's 4chan that reads like this thread! |
joepie91
replied
Jan 22, 2016
Oh yes. Yes, there is. |
jmendeth
replied
Jan 22, 2016
|
@joepie91 Oh. Not sure if feeling jealous or relieved right now. |
joepie91
replied
Jan 22, 2016
|
@jmendeth Well, to be fair, that one destroyed entire systems. |
mryellow
replied
Feb 7, 2016
|
Disgusting github, absolutely disgusting. |
nuxy
replied
Feb 7, 2016
|
Not even worth thinking about people. It's just a word dammit. Reminds me of this intelligent Kids in the Hall skit. |
RichardJCase
replied
Feb 3, 2017
|
|
mryellow
replied
Feb 3, 2017
|
Absolutely ridiculous. Love the irony that |
krainboltgreene
replied
Feb 3, 2017
|
Yes, in the same way Pluto is like Earth.
…
|
piedoom
replied
Feb 4, 2017
•
Edited 1 time
-
piedoom
Feb 4, 2017
-
Feb 4, 2017
oh god please let's not start this again*cough* but yes, in no way does the word "git" have any sort of historical meaning compared to "retard" which is hurtful to those with learning disabilities. "git" is the same as calling someone "silly" and it REALLY doesn't come close to calling someone a slur. Also "muh freeze peach" doesn't apply on a private website with their own code of conduct. In any case, why not let all people feel welcome? If you wanna go ahead and say that shit, go ahead, but don't be surprised when people call you a dick. (Also inb4 skids try to make a counterpoint by saying that calling someone a dick is just as bad as saying "retard") *cough* |
ticki
replied
Feb 4, 2017
|
Get over it, snowflakes. You are just like the "sjws" you're complaining about. You ain't havin' none of those freeze peaches. |
snow-frog
replied
Feb 4, 2017
|
sage and hide |
dandv
replied
Feb 4, 2017
|
There are two kinds of people in this world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data |
hendraanggrian
replied
Feb 17, 2017
|
Now I wonder, what else could they possibly ban? |
makc
replied
Feb 18, 2017
|
|
ddraws
replied
Apr 16, 2017
|
Hope in humanity: -20pt |
MrStonedOne
replied
Apr 16, 2017
|
Why am I still subscribed to this commit? |
piedoom
replied
Apr 16, 2017
idk b |
woat
replied
Apr 28, 2017
|
hahahahahah |
ergo
replied
Jun 7, 2017
|
Just host on your own with https://rhodecode.com/ - Supports git,mercurial and svn + its open source. |
piedoom
replied
Jun 7, 2017
anyone else in this thread smoke weed |
jjvvx
replied
Jul 7, 2017
|
when's the emoji movie coming out btw |
piedoom
replied
Jul 7, 2017
|
july 28th 2017 |
jjvvx
replied
Jul 7, 2017
|
thanks
On Jul 7, 2017 1:57 AM, "Alexander Lozada" <notifications@github.com> wrote:
july 28th 2017
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<c1ac0ba#commitcomment-22965709>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APUZP8V63gqOS_6zKLJq4B7bivwWAZ8aks5sLbrDgaJpZM4FhqOt>
.
|
ticki
replied
Jul 22, 2017
|
only 6 days left |
piedoom
replied
Jul 23, 2017
|
5 days to go. |
piedoom
replied
Jul 27, 2017
|
@ticki @joaquin-v @nixxquality @go1dfish @MarbleFag @tolbiac110 @smeezekitty @woat @ergo @makc @ddraws @hendraanggrian @snow-frog @mryellow @nuxy @RichardJCase emoji movie in theaters tomorrow. who up to go? |
onodera-punpun
replied
Jul 27, 2017
|
Anyone wants do some kind of live viewing thing once it's up for download? Where we discuss the movie live in this thread? |
ticki
replied
Jul 27, 2017
|
Sounds cool to me. |
piedoom
replied
Jul 27, 2017
|
Great idea. |
piedoom
replied
Jul 29, 2017
|
hey guys, i found this new book and i was wondering if any of you had any thoughts. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf |
ticki
replied
Aug 4, 2017
|
@piedoom A good read indeed. |
jjvvx
replied
Aug 13, 2017
|
my name jeff
…
|
piedoom
replied
Aug 14, 2017
|
my name isnt |
I think you mean "This is gitted"