/WebMConverter forked from WebMBro/WebMConverter

Permalink
Browse files

https://imgur.com/QC51FZz

  • Loading branch information...
@nixxquality
nixxquality committed Jul 28, 2015
1 parent 7a07b67 commit c1ac0baac06fa7175677a4a1bf65860a84708d67
Unified Split
Showing with 6 additions and 6 deletions.
  1. +1 −1 MainForm.Designer.cs
  2. +3 −3 Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
  3. +2 −2 README.md
View
2 MainForm.Designer.cs

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more.

Oops, something went wrong.
View
6 Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
// General Information about an assembly is controlled through the following
// set of attributes. Change these attribute values to modify the information
// associated with an assembly.
[assembly: AssemblyTitle("WebM for Retards")]

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lolzballs

lolzballs Jul 29, 2015

I think you mean "This is gitted"
Copy URL
@lolzballs

lolzballs Jul 29, 2015

I think you mean "This is gitted"
[assembly: AssemblyTitle("WebM for Gits")]
[assembly: AssemblyDescription("")]
[assembly: AssemblyConfiguration("")]
[assembly: AssemblyCompany("")]
[assembly: AssemblyProduct("WebM for Retards")]
[assembly: AssemblyProduct("WebM for Gits")]

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sammcj

sammcj Jul 29, 2015

As a Git I find the term Git offensive.
Copy URL
@sammcj

sammcj Jul 29, 2015

As a Git I find the term Git offensive.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@verydapeng

verydapeng Jul 29, 2015

👍
Copy URL
@verydapeng

verydapeng Jul 29, 2015

👍

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sammcj

sammcj Jul 29, 2015

@verydapeng I'm sorry but as a 👎 I find your 👍 offensive.
Copy URL
@sammcj

sammcj Jul 29, 2015

@verydapeng I'm sorry but as a 👎 I find your 👍 offensive.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jbrooksuk

jbrooksuk Jul 29, 2015

Hah @sammcj, you git.
Copy URL
@jbrooksuk

jbrooksuk Jul 29, 2015

Hah @sammcj, you git.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sammcj

sammcj Jul 29, 2015

@jbrooksuk I'm sorry but as a @sammcj I find your @sammcj offensive.
Copy URL
@sammcj

sammcj Jul 29, 2015

@jbrooksuk I'm sorry but as a @sammcj I find your @sammcj offensive.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lolzballs

lolzballs Jul 29, 2015

Git is a mild pejorative with origins in British English for a silly, incompetent, stupid, annoying, senile, elderly or childish person.

I find the term Git offensive.
Copy URL
@lolzballs

lolzballs Jul 29, 2015

Git is a mild pejorative with origins in British English for a silly, incompetent, stupid, annoying, senile, elderly or childish person.

I find the term Git offensive.

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@hopeseekr

hopeseekr Jun 2, 2018

As a Texan, I say "get" and "git" identically. Lots of people in NYC said I was "gitted" (well, another word that starts with an "r" that can be found on this very page, in fact!), when I worked up there.
Copy URL
@hopeseekr

hopeseekr Jun 2, 2018

As a Texan, I say "get" and "git" identically. Lots of people in NYC said I was "gitted" (well, another word that starts with an "r" that can be found on this very page, in fact!), when I worked up there.
[assembly: AssemblyCopyright("Copyright © 2014")]
[assembly: AssemblyTrademark("")]
[assembly: AssemblyCulture("")]
@@ -32,4 +32,4 @@
// You can specify all the values or you can default the Build and Revision Numbers
// by using the '*' as shown below:
// [assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.0.*")]
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("2.18.0")]
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("2.18.1")]
View
4 README.md
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
WebM for Retards [![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/2pekcy840jr7atft)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/nixxquality/webmconverter)
WebM for Gits [![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/2pekcy840jr7atft)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/nixxquality/webmconverter)
=============
A wrapper around ffmpeg and Avisynth made for converting videos to WebM without having to use the command line.
Download it [here](https://github.com/nixxquality/WebMConverter/releases).
Download the latest Converter.zip.
Don't run ffmpeg.exe you retard, run WebMConverter.exe.
Don't run ffmpeg.exe you git, run WebMConverter.exe.
And I shouldn't have to tell you to extract the zip file first.
Also, don't click "Download ZIP" on the right side of the page, that'll only download the source. (unless you want to compile it yourself, obviously)

445 comments on commit c1ac0ba

@smeezekitty

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@smeezekitty

smeezekitty Aug 5, 2015

All I did was say my opinion. If you ever have (or do have children) and one of them has a special need and comes home to you crying that the other kids call you a retard, you will get this terrible sinking black hole feeling inside you, because it's something you can't fix. You just hug your boy and tell him him, "NO YOU ARE NOT! THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE JERKS!".

You're right. I would be offended by that.

If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

However, this has absolutely nothing to do with GitHUB decision. Using the word jokingly (like the "for dummies" series) is vastly different than using the word directly to refer to a mentally challenged person.

those impressionable youngsters are gonna take that to school, and the bullying begins. I fucking hate bullies. They hurt my son and make him cry.

You are stretching that extremely far

smeezekitty replied Aug 5, 2015

All I did was say my opinion. If you ever have (or do have children) and one of them has a special need and comes home to you crying that the other kids call you a retard, you will get this terrible sinking black hole feeling inside you, because it's something you can't fix. You just hug your boy and tell him him, "NO YOU ARE NOT! THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE JERKS!".

You're right. I would be offended by that.

If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

However, this has absolutely nothing to do with GitHUB decision. Using the word jokingly (like the "for dummies" series) is vastly different than using the word directly to refer to a mentally challenged person.

those impressionable youngsters are gonna take that to school, and the bullying begins. I fucking hate bullies. They hurt my son and make him cry.

You are stretching that extremely far
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 5, 2015

I was here first.

krainboltgreene replied Aug 5, 2015

I was here first.
@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Aug 5, 2015

@daveryder

If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

I understand you, I've been in a similar position. But it just takes a bit of maturity to understand that the word "retard" is being used with the same sense as i.e. "dummy". They are not trying to make fun of actual retarded people, so why should they get offended by that?

jmendeth replied Aug 5, 2015

@daveryder

If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

I understand you, I've been in a similar position. But it just takes a bit of maturity to understand that the word "retard" is being used with the same sense as i.e. "dummy". They are not trying to make fun of actual retarded people, so why should they get offended by that?
@smeezekitty

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@smeezekitty

smeezekitty Aug 5, 2015

@krainboltgreene

You sound like a small child crying and stomping his feet.

smeezekitty replied Aug 5, 2015

@krainboltgreene

You sound like a small child crying and stomping his feet.
@joepie91

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joepie91

joepie91 Aug 5, 2015

@daveryder: If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

Context matters. If such an event drives you to take issue with every use of the word, regardless of context, then that speaks of your own personal bias - not the inappropriateness of others. Such bias is understandable, but not a good advisor for rational decisionmaking.

The situation you sketched really has nothing to do with this incident, and there's no plausible evidence that insulting use of a word is encouraged by it being used in a facetious manner - quite the opposite, in fact. The facetious use is derived from the insulting use, and really only serves to weaken the effectiveness of it as an insult (as the word is not taken seriously anymore).

joepie91 replied Aug 5, 2015

@daveryder: If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

Context matters. If such an event drives you to take issue with every use of the word, regardless of context, then that speaks of your own personal bias - not the inappropriateness of others. Such bias is understandable, but not a good advisor for rational decisionmaking.

The situation you sketched really has nothing to do with this incident, and there's no plausible evidence that insulting use of a word is encouraged by it being used in a facetious manner - quite the opposite, in fact. The facetious use is derived from the insulting use, and really only serves to weaken the effectiveness of it as an insult (as the word is not taken seriously anymore).
@davispuh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@davispuh

davispuh Aug 5, 2015

LOL @daveryder looks like you don't understand what the issue is and basically your whole post is about completely different issues. And honestly I don't agree with your idea.

If you ever have (or do have children) and one of them has a special need and comes home to you crying that the other kids call you a retard, you will get this terrible sinking black hole feeling inside you, because it's something you can't fix. You just hug your boy and tell him him, "NO YOU ARE NOT! THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE JERKS!".

How's that relevant? How those other kids are related to a website? Also by the way IMO that's a bad parenting and a stupid answer as you would be lying to your own retarded kid by saying he's not retard when he actually is. Better answer would be to tell him to ignore it. Don't you realize that you're overprotective and you will never be able to always help him anyway? And it doesn't matter what word is used as there are millions of ways to insult and make someone offended.

If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

And, what if I am? What you gonna do? Maybe I don't have any love, compassion, empathy, etc.

If making a post on a community I don't even use can make even one individual think to themselves "maybe there is a better, or nicer way of getting my message across, one that doesn't make innocent children miserable" then I feel I've possibly done some good in this life.

If only that would be so easy, but you can keep trying all you want, I don't care and I really don't agree with that idea that some words on a website would make some child miserable.

if a family's "cool uncle hacker" throws around words like retard and nigger, and thinks "intelligent" people are better than "dumb" people, those impressionable youngsters are gonna take that to school, and the bullying begins.

Jeez, that's a bad argument, do you really believe that creates bullying? And basically by your logic you're saying websites should remove "bad" words and somehow that will change that uncle to stop using those words, WTF?

I fucking hate bullies. They hurt my son and make him cry.

Do you know that kids also cry when they don't get candy they want and will scream all over the shop? It really sounds like you're not a good parent and that you'll try to change world just to indulge your kids on their whim. People like you are reason why there's such spoiled kids who can't do anything themselves.

davispuh replied Aug 5, 2015

LOL @daveryder looks like you don't understand what the issue is and basically your whole post is about completely different issues. And honestly I don't agree with your idea.

If you ever have (or do have children) and one of them has a special need and comes home to you crying that the other kids call you a retard, you will get this terrible sinking black hole feeling inside you, because it's something you can't fix. You just hug your boy and tell him him, "NO YOU ARE NOT! THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE JERKS!".

How's that relevant? How those other kids are related to a website? Also by the way IMO that's a bad parenting and a stupid answer as you would be lying to your own retarded kid by saying he's not retard when he actually is. Better answer would be to tell him to ignore it. Don't you realize that you're overprotective and you will never be able to always help him anyway? And it doesn't matter what word is used as there are millions of ways to insult and make someone offended.

If you are ever in that situation, I GUARANTEE you will switch sides, unless you were born without a single ounce of love and compassion.

And, what if I am? What you gonna do? Maybe I don't have any love, compassion, empathy, etc.

If making a post on a community I don't even use can make even one individual think to themselves "maybe there is a better, or nicer way of getting my message across, one that doesn't make innocent children miserable" then I feel I've possibly done some good in this life.

If only that would be so easy, but you can keep trying all you want, I don't care and I really don't agree with that idea that some words on a website would make some child miserable.

if a family's "cool uncle hacker" throws around words like retard and nigger, and thinks "intelligent" people are better than "dumb" people, those impressionable youngsters are gonna take that to school, and the bullying begins.

Jeez, that's a bad argument, do you really believe that creates bullying? And basically by your logic you're saying websites should remove "bad" words and somehow that will change that uncle to stop using those words, WTF?

I fucking hate bullies. They hurt my son and make him cry.

Do you know that kids also cry when they don't get candy they want and will scream all over the shop? It really sounds like you're not a good parent and that you'll try to change world just to indulge your kids on their whim. People like you are reason why there's such spoiled kids who can't do anything themselves.
@chriscummings

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chriscummings

chriscummings Aug 5, 2015

Perhaps instead of worrying about individual words, Github should have just made it easy to ignore/block/shadow-ban people.

Seems like a far more likely solution to the "mean people problem." Meanwhile, you have @krainboltgreene apparently leading the parade, holding the banner of peace and goodwill.

Wait, no, he's an insipid troll. Ah... well, that is what always seems to happen. Every. Time.

Kudos!

chriscummings replied Aug 5, 2015

Perhaps instead of worrying about individual words, Github should have just made it easy to ignore/block/shadow-ban people.

Seems like a far more likely solution to the "mean people problem." Meanwhile, you have @krainboltgreene apparently leading the parade, holding the banner of peace and goodwill.

Wait, no, he's an insipid troll. Ah... well, that is what always seems to happen. Every. Time.

Kudos!
@Faiz7412

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Faiz7412

Faiz7412 Aug 6, 2015

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html

Faiz7412 replied Aug 6, 2015

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@arthurkay I think @krainboltgreene is more than welcome here. As much as I do not agree with his opinion on twitter, it is just his own opinion on twitter, and it is not a reason to shut him up. Just because you don't agree with his opinion. Besides, if you do not agree with his opinion, and think it is morally incorrect, why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong. Don't forget, gay/transgender community has not been listened too, and suppressed just because everyone thought that this people has no right to talk.
So don't make the same mistake. Constructive argument based on fact. Not child-bitching.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@arthurkay I think @krainboltgreene is more than welcome here. As much as I do not agree with his opinion on twitter, it is just his own opinion on twitter, and it is not a reason to shut him up. Just because you don't agree with his opinion. Besides, if you do not agree with his opinion, and think it is morally incorrect, why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong. Don't forget, gay/transgender community has not been listened too, and suppressed just because everyone thought that this people has no right to talk.
So don't make the same mistake. Constructive argument based on fact. Not child-bitching.
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong.

what if he does not care? can you call him names then?

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong.

what if he does not care? can you call him names then?
@joepie91

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joepie91

joepie91 Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand: I think @krainboltgreene is more than welcome here. As much as I do not agree with his opinion on twitter, it is just his own opinion on twitter, and it is not a reason to shut him up. Just because you don't agree with his opinion. Besides, if you do not agree with his opinion, and think it is morally incorrect, why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong.

A number of people have tried that throughout the course of this thread (ctrl+F 'krainboltgreene'), and he has consistently ignored such explanations, and blindly repeated his statements.

joepie91 replied Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand: I think @krainboltgreene is more than welcome here. As much as I do not agree with his opinion on twitter, it is just his own opinion on twitter, and it is not a reason to shut him up. Just because you don't agree with his opinion. Besides, if you do not agree with his opinion, and think it is morally incorrect, why don't you be nice and explain to him constructively why his opinion is wrong.

A number of people have tried that throughout the course of this thread (ctrl+F 'krainboltgreene'), and he has consistently ignored such explanations, and blindly repeated his statements.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@makc @joepie91 Then lets buy our self a lolly and give up. Life tends to fix things like this, and I am good example. I never was anti-transgender, but I did offended once some with a bad joke, and I did learn the consequences. But nobody kicked me, and so it is apply to @krainboltgreene. If we want to be effective as developer community we need to be constructive to our decisions in development, and communication. Any bulling within our community should be suppressed, but not the disagreement in opinions. And if we will start to bitch around about "Oh he said that, and he said that" then we are missing the point. If @krainboltgreene will abuse someone directly, then action should be taken. Otherwise it his own opinion.
P.S. I don't like onion, so it is my opinion, and I am not forcing it on someone.

Another thing I found is that people tend to try change people opinion about something by force rather then reasoning, like

  • "If you are not Christian you will burn in hell."
  • "If you are not Muslim you should be dead."
  • "If you have bad opinion about gay/transgender you are a homophobic and should not maintain this project."

So I think @krainboltgreene have exactly same right as anyone in this community, and saying him to leave the thread is just childish.
I am not defending or supporting anyone. I am stating that those become prejudiced to the ones who are not share their opinion, even if it is morally incorrect by their opinion, are not better then the ones who might have that wrong opinion.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@makc @joepie91 Then lets buy our self a lolly and give up. Life tends to fix things like this, and I am good example. I never was anti-transgender, but I did offended once some with a bad joke, and I did learn the consequences. But nobody kicked me, and so it is apply to @krainboltgreene. If we want to be effective as developer community we need to be constructive to our decisions in development, and communication. Any bulling within our community should be suppressed, but not the disagreement in opinions. And if we will start to bitch around about "Oh he said that, and he said that" then we are missing the point. If @krainboltgreene will abuse someone directly, then action should be taken. Otherwise it his own opinion.
P.S. I don't like onion, so it is my opinion, and I am not forcing it on someone.

Another thing I found is that people tend to try change people opinion about something by force rather then reasoning, like

  • "If you are not Christian you will burn in hell."
  • "If you are not Muslim you should be dead."
  • "If you have bad opinion about gay/transgender you are a homophobic and should not maintain this project."

So I think @krainboltgreene have exactly same right as anyone in this community, and saying him to leave the thread is just childish.
I am not defending or supporting anyone. I am stating that those become prejudiced to the ones who are not share their opinion, even if it is morally incorrect by their opinion, are not better then the ones who might have that wrong opinion.
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand you are not consistent,

If @krainboltgreene will abuse someone directly, then action should be taken.

why? are you the police? if somebody abuses someone, but makes good security hole fix to your project, would you not merge his fix?

maybe you mean indirect action, such as reporting the abuse. then it's fine, and if by deleting his account they delete his contribution too, this is unfortunate, but at least you are not the one to blame for it.

Otherwise it his own opinion.

oh please. other people may actually listen to him and act. and you will be like "oh he did not put jews in the oven, he only said he thinks we need to"?

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand you are not consistent,

If @krainboltgreene will abuse someone directly, then action should be taken.

why? are you the police? if somebody abuses someone, but makes good security hole fix to your project, would you not merge his fix?

maybe you mean indirect action, such as reporting the abuse. then it's fine, and if by deleting his account they delete his contribution too, this is unfortunate, but at least you are not the one to blame for it.

Otherwise it his own opinion.

oh please. other people may actually listen to him and act. and you will be like "oh he did not put jews in the oven, he only said he thinks we need to"?
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@makc by the action I mean action about the abuse. Deleting account does not help anyone. And I meant the community, the project maintainers, not me.

Now about opinion. It is his own opinion. You are free to criticise it. But "kick him out of maintainers because he writes on twitter something homophobic/antitransgender" is sound exactly the same to as "Jews execution(May theirs souls find their peace) during WW2" and "Stalin political repressions". Remember when crowd burned Scientists? Well lets not burn anyone, and just teach people to respect each other, rather then bitching around.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@makc by the action I mean action about the abuse. Deleting account does not help anyone. And I meant the community, the project maintainers, not me.

Now about opinion. It is his own opinion. You are free to criticise it. But "kick him out of maintainers because he writes on twitter something homophobic/antitransgender" is sound exactly the same to as "Jews execution(May theirs souls find their peace) during WW2" and "Stalin political repressions". Remember when crowd burned Scientists? Well lets not burn anyone, and just teach people to respect each other, rather then bitching around.
@joepie91

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joepie91

joepie91 Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand I feel like your comments should be directed primarily at @krainboltgreene, not at those criticizing him.

joepie91 replied Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand I feel like your comments should be directed primarily at @krainboltgreene, not at those criticizing him.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@joepie91 my comments are directed to the community as whole. We are so concerned about what people say, rather they do and what they can do, that we are simply happy to remove developer because his opinion is wrong. We stopped being able to accept criticism from others, and we are happy to use rules that were made for good, for the removing people that are offending us.

As I said before: I do not agree with @krainboltgreene opinion. But I am neither agree with "Piss off Ghazi, you're not welcome here.". If you think that you are better then @krainboltgreene, then maybe you should act like that.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@joepie91 my comments are directed to the community as whole. We are so concerned about what people say, rather they do and what they can do, that we are simply happy to remove developer because his opinion is wrong. We stopped being able to accept criticism from others, and we are happy to use rules that were made for good, for the removing people that are offending us.

As I said before: I do not agree with @krainboltgreene opinion. But I am neither agree with "Piss off Ghazi, you're not welcome here.". If you think that you are better then @krainboltgreene, then maybe you should act like that.
@joepie91

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joepie91

joepie91 Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand I'm not arguing that @krainboltgreene should be removed. My point is that he started out with the exclusionary "go away" behaviour (repeatedly), and others have simply been dishing out the same in return.

joepie91 replied Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand I'm not arguing that @krainboltgreene should be removed. My point is that he started out with the exclusionary "go away" behaviour (repeatedly), and others have simply been dishing out the same in return.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@joepie91 yea, I know.
P.S. Using my right to criticize:
@krainboltgreene stop behaving like a fucking dick.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@joepie91 yea, I know.
P.S. Using my right to criticize:
@krainboltgreene stop behaving like a fucking dick.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@joepie91 I guess I just generally went out about the fact that people want other people to be gone and used @krainboltgreene as example.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@joepie91 I guess I just generally went out about the fact that people want other people to be gone and used @krainboltgreene as example.
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene well. I guess it was not he most nice comparison. But it was equally bad reply as "oh he did not put jews in the oven, he only said he thinks we need to". From another view point it is conceptually the same. You trying to get rid of "morally incompatible people". It is physical in dictature, or verbally on github.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene well. I guess it was not he most nice comparison. But it was equally bad reply as "oh he did not put jews in the oven, he only said he thinks we need to". From another view point it is conceptually the same. You trying to get rid of "morally incompatible people". It is physical in dictature, or verbally on github.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene but yea. It went a bit wrong.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene but yea. It went a bit wrong.
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

not the only developer in the entire world who can fix that problem

yeah but the fix is there, and you opt to punish your software users for the sins of the contributer. this is retarded.

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

not the only developer in the entire world who can fix that problem

yeah but the fix is there, and you opt to punish your software users for the sins of the contributer. this is retarded.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@makc what?

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@makc what?
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand read few posts above. in that somewhat imaginary scenario users are punished by having to run the software with security hole unpatched for some extra time because maintainer dislikes the contributor.

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

@herrniemand read few posts above. in that somewhat imaginary scenario users are punished by having to run the software with security hole unpatched for some extra time because maintainer dislikes the contributor.
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 6, 2015

@makc oh. Sorry. Misunderstanding. Yes. That what I was talking about.

herrjemand replied Aug 6, 2015

@makc oh. Sorry. Misunderstanding. Yes. That what I was talking about.
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

Seriously, accepting contributions from bad, in your opinion, people is not the big deal. If you could use nazi rocket scientists to get to the moon, would you? If you could get blood transfusion from serial killer to save your own life, would you? Hell, you have no problem picking up the loot from your enemies in the video games. The examples are countless. But no, the software development is completely different business.

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

Seriously, accepting contributions from bad, in your opinion, people is not the big deal. If you could use nazi rocket scientists to get to the moon, would you? If you could get blood transfusion from serial killer to save your own life, would you? Hell, you have no problem picking up the loot from your enemies in the video games. The examples are countless. But no, the software development is completely different business.
@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Aug 6, 2015

Hell, you have no problem picking up the loot from your enemies in the video games.

Nailed it.

jmendeth replied Aug 6, 2015

Hell, you have no problem picking up the loot from your enemies in the video games.

Nailed it.
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

:)

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

:)
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

and by "you people" you mean "whoever @krainboltgreene does not like", right?

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

and by "you people" you mean "whoever @krainboltgreene does not like", right?
@davispuh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@davispuh

davispuh Aug 6, 2015

I have no words to tell how much I hate these SJWs and other "thought/morale police" and they're infesting everything, Reddit, GitHub, etc, I guess it's just matter of time till only way for sane people will be websites on Tor hidden services.
If code is good, I will accept commits from mass murders, ISIS, rapists, serial killers whatever, I don't care, it's irrelevant to the code.

davispuh replied Aug 6, 2015

I have no words to tell how much I hate these SJWs and other "thought/morale police" and they're infesting everything, Reddit, GitHub, etc, I guess it's just matter of time till only way for sane people will be websites on Tor hidden services.
If code is good, I will accept commits from mass murders, ISIS, rapists, serial killers whatever, I don't care, it's irrelevant to the code.
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Aug 6, 2015

If code is good, I will accept commits from mass murders, ISIS, rapists, serial killers whatever, I don't care, it's irrelevant to the code.

maybe not fro NSA, though. who knows, they might be planting back doors there.

makc replied Aug 6, 2015

If code is good, I will accept commits from mass murders, ISIS, rapists, serial killers whatever, I don't care, it's irrelevant to the code.

maybe not fro NSA, though. who knows, they might be planting back doors there.
@davispuh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@davispuh

davispuh Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene what ethics? I don't see there anything unethical, code is code and if it solves a problem it doesn't matter who wrote it.

maybe not fro NSA, though. who knows, they might be planting back doors there.

@makc how do you know that contributor who sent you a PR isn't from NSA? and do you think others like China wouldn't want backdoors too?
You can't know who is that contributor and what actual intentions he have so there's no point of looking at that, but need to carefully inspect patch and always learn new things so you would notice anything fishy ;)

Anyway I think I'll better stop posting here.

davispuh replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene what ethics? I don't see there anything unethical, code is code and if it solves a problem it doesn't matter who wrote it.

maybe not fro NSA, though. who knows, they might be planting back doors there.

@makc how do you know that contributor who sent you a PR isn't from NSA? and do you think others like China wouldn't want backdoors too?
You can't know who is that contributor and what actual intentions he have so there's no point of looking at that, but need to carefully inspect patch and always learn new things so you would notice anything fishy ;)

Anyway I think I'll better stop posting here.
@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Aug 6, 2015

"Ethics".

TIL that innocent ASCII characters have ethics attached. Wow.

jmendeth replied Aug 6, 2015

"Ethics".

TIL that innocent ASCII characters have ethics attached. Wow.
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Aug 6, 2015

You are not working with ISIS by merging some patches into your project, even if those patches are written by ISIS, because the code is supposedly under a FOSS license and has no owner. Whoever wrote the patches, it has the same effect on your project.

jmendeth replied Aug 6, 2015

You are not working with ISIS by merging some patches into your project, even if those patches are written by ISIS, because the code is supposedly under a FOSS license and has no owner. Whoever wrote the patches, it has the same effect on your project.
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@davispuh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@davispuh

davispuh Aug 6, 2015

Yeah, go ahead and explain to me how it's ethical to (theoretically) work with ISIS. Pleeeeeeease.

@krainboltgreene okay, but only this time and I know you're such a troll.

I mentioned several groups like mass murders, etc. but you're only interested in ISIS? Nazis killed more people and I would accept their commits too but all you care is ISIS this, ISIS that.

Okay so do you know that doctors/physicians are obligated to abide by Declaration of Geneva (like Hippocratic Oath) and there's a point

  • I will not permit considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

So they are obligated to help everyone, even ISIS. If a member of ISIS is about to die in their hospital they'll do whatever they can to save him. And this in fact is ethical, while not saving would be unethical.

You're saying I should discriminate people (eg. like ISIS) but I won't discriminate anyone, same as a doctor wouldn't discriminate anyone.
Also it's not working with ISIS, they would be working for me by contributing to my project and adding useful features who would be used and appreciated by users who would find them very useful.

davispuh replied Aug 6, 2015

Yeah, go ahead and explain to me how it's ethical to (theoretically) work with ISIS. Pleeeeeeease.

@krainboltgreene okay, but only this time and I know you're such a troll.

I mentioned several groups like mass murders, etc. but you're only interested in ISIS? Nazis killed more people and I would accept their commits too but all you care is ISIS this, ISIS that.

Okay so do you know that doctors/physicians are obligated to abide by Declaration of Geneva (like Hippocratic Oath) and there's a point

  • I will not permit considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

So they are obligated to help everyone, even ISIS. If a member of ISIS is about to die in their hospital they'll do whatever they can to save him. And this in fact is ethical, while not saving would be unethical.

You're saying I should discriminate people (eg. like ISIS) but I won't discriminate anyone, same as a doctor wouldn't discriminate anyone.
Also it's not working with ISIS, they would be working for me by contributing to my project and adding useful features who would be used and appreciated by users who would find them very useful.
@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene Your trolling strategy needs some refinement. Try actually making arguments from time to time instead of repeating ad-hominem, vague statements and insults.

jmendeth replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene Your trolling strategy needs some refinement. Try actually making arguments from time to time instead of repeating ad-hominem, vague statements and insults.
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 6, 2015

krainboltgreene replied Aug 6, 2015

@smeezekitty

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@smeezekitty

smeezekitty Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

Fingers in your ears "lalalalala"

smeezekitty replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

Fingers in your ears "lalalalala"
@Faiz7412

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Faiz7412

Faiz7412 Aug 6, 2015

Don't ask github to be cool about it. As someone who's had a fever in the past 6 months, being asked if I'm "cool" with something makes me feel personally attacked.

Faiz7412 replied Aug 6, 2015

Don't ask github to be cool about it. As someone who's had a fever in the past 6 months, being asked if I'm "cool" with something makes me feel personally attacked.
@onodera-punpun

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@onodera-punpun

onodera-punpun Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

I like how you literally just keep posting rants without responding to anyone, for example @j-pb who says he has an actual disability, I'll quote if for you.

@krainboltgreene I don't get your position. What changes for you if the repos of people you don't like are on github or on a different hoster? You don't see them in any case.

Besides, please don't act as if you were some kind of representative of anything. You are certainly not a representative of people that face the same disabilities as me and @g7823564 because you don't have a neurodegenerative disease. You're not a representative of github.

You're at best alienating people from the very real issues people with disability face, so please just stop, or be civil.

Every response you've made is the equivalent of, "lalalalalalalala i'm not listening stop having different opinions that me." It's pathetic.

onodera-punpun replied Aug 6, 2015

@krainboltgreene

I like how you literally just keep posting rants without responding to anyone, for example @j-pb who says he has an actual disability, I'll quote if for you.

@krainboltgreene I don't get your position. What changes for you if the repos of people you don't like are on github or on a different hoster? You don't see them in any case.

Besides, please don't act as if you were some kind of representative of anything. You are certainly not a representative of people that face the same disabilities as me and @g7823564 because you don't have a neurodegenerative disease. You're not a representative of github.

You're at best alienating people from the very real issues people with disability face, so please just stop, or be civil.

Every response you've made is the equivalent of, "lalalalalalalala i'm not listening stop having different opinions that me." It's pathetic.
@emente

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@emente

emente Aug 7, 2015

Rick: Cute. Your sister's boss gave me a microscope that would have made me retarded.
Morty: Ooo, oh boy Rick, I-I-I don't think you're allowed to say that word. Ya know?
Rick: Uh Morty, I'm not disparaging the differently abled. I'm stating the fact that if I had used this microscope it would have made me mentally retarded.
Morty: Ok but yeah, I don't think it's about logic, Rick. I-I think the word has just become a symbolic issue for powerful groups that feel like they're doing the right thing.
Rick: Well that's retarded.

emente replied Aug 7, 2015

Rick: Cute. Your sister's boss gave me a microscope that would have made me retarded.
Morty: Ooo, oh boy Rick, I-I-I don't think you're allowed to say that word. Ya know?
Rick: Uh Morty, I'm not disparaging the differently abled. I'm stating the fact that if I had used this microscope it would have made me mentally retarded.
Morty: Ok but yeah, I don't think it's about logic, Rick. I-I think the word has just become a symbolic issue for powerful groups that feel like they're doing the right thing.
Rick: Well that's retarded.
@Faiz7412

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Faiz7412

Faiz7412 Aug 7, 2015

^ continued..
Morty: Oh you Git!

Faiz7412 replied Aug 7, 2015

^ continued..
Morty: Oh you Git!
@lukaseder

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lukaseder

lukaseder Aug 9, 2015

Suis-je déjà en retard pour cette discussion?

lukaseder replied Aug 9, 2015

Suis-je déjà en retard pour cette discussion?
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 9, 2015

@lukaseder Oui! *)

herrjemand replied Aug 9, 2015

@lukaseder Oui! *)
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 9, 2015

Post-scriptum: Ban est en attente pour vous ... ... et tous les francophones ....

herrjemand replied Aug 9, 2015

Post-scriptum: Ban est en attente pour vous ... ... et tous les francophones ....
@lukaseder

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lukaseder

lukaseder Aug 9, 2015

Ici gît donc le bon sens

lukaseder replied Aug 9, 2015

Ici gît donc le bon sens
@herrjemand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@herrjemand

herrjemand Aug 9, 2015

@lukaseder Absurde je ne vois que!

herrjemand replied Aug 9, 2015

@lukaseder Absurde je ne vois que!
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Aug 9, 2015

That face when you find out Gitlab also has a code of conduct (an even better one than Github's TODO choice): https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

Hahahaha. Sucks to be assholes.

krainboltgreene replied Aug 9, 2015

That face when you find out Gitlab also has a code of conduct (an even better one than Github's TODO choice): https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

Hahahaha. Sucks to be assholes.
@fbt

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fbt

fbt Aug 10, 2015

That code of conduct has nothing to do with self-hosted gitlab instances.

Edit: it's also not retarded, as far as I can see.

fbt replied Aug 10, 2015

That code of conduct has nothing to do with self-hosted gitlab instances.

Edit: it's also not retarded, as far as I can see.
@jgrigonis

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jgrigonis

jgrigonis Aug 10, 2015

jgrigonis replied Aug 10, 2015

@cmdrkotori

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmdrkotori

cmdrkotori Aug 10, 2015

@krainboltgreene You know what the real burning question on everyone's mind is? Are including in a terms of service any discriminatory terms that limit the ability of consumers to enter the market an abuse of Market Power, which is illegal in some jurisdictions? Github is in fact not allowed to reserve the right to "refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time" under the law. For instance, under the Civil Rights Act it may not refuse to host repos on the basis of race, religion, age, sex, etc. This is far from "for any reason". Gitlab is much better in this respect than the laughable Code of Conduct that Github endorses.

And speaking of the Civil Rights Act, "Webm for retards" works rather nice with the principle of affirmative action. Ergo, taking down the repo was actually discriminating against the mentally disabled rather than helping them because its use enables awareness of the disabled which in fact was mentioned earlier in the thread. Therefore no law is broken by allowing the use of "retard" in this case.

Now as far as removing content based on the grounds of harassing, insulting behaviour: it is best left for a court to decide if a particular piece of content constitutes harassing or insulting behaviour, because hosting something despite setting yourself up for having a policy of taking said content down exposes Github to the liability of failing to remove content wrt the law should someone die for instance having to explain to a committee why didn't you put the proverbial fire out sooner since you've done so with other repos. Therefore operating under the common carrier and public space provisions of the law and going the way of "the best code of conduct is no code of conduct" (aka less is more) route would have been much safer than Github's current practice of indiscriminate takedowns and get this is actually closer to other parts of its terms of service such as "You shall defend GitHub against any claim, demand, suit or proceeding made or brought against GitHub by a third-party alleging that Your Content, or Your use of the Service in violation of this Agreement" which place the burden on users rather than Github as being responsible for content. But of course since Github now wants to do the opposite of the weightier legal parts of its terms of service by placing more weight on the "General Conditions" section than the "Content Ownership" section, then we the users are not going to be the only ones responsible for anything that happens which is likely not what Github would want.

Overall this trend of censorship in the public space by private corporations is rather dumb.

cmdrkotori replied Aug 10, 2015

@krainboltgreene You know what the real burning question on everyone's mind is? Are including in a terms of service any discriminatory terms that limit the ability of consumers to enter the market an abuse of Market Power, which is illegal in some jurisdictions? Github is in fact not allowed to reserve the right to "refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time" under the law. For instance, under the Civil Rights Act it may not refuse to host repos on the basis of race, religion, age, sex, etc. This is far from "for any reason". Gitlab is much better in this respect than the laughable Code of Conduct that Github endorses.

And speaking of the Civil Rights Act, "Webm for retards" works rather nice with the principle of affirmative action. Ergo, taking down the repo was actually discriminating against the mentally disabled rather than helping them because its use enables awareness of the disabled which in fact was mentioned earlier in the thread. Therefore no law is broken by allowing the use of "retard" in this case.

Now as far as removing content based on the grounds of harassing, insulting behaviour: it is best left for a court to decide if a particular piece of content constitutes harassing or insulting behaviour, because hosting something despite setting yourself up for having a policy of taking said content down exposes Github to the liability of failing to remove content wrt the law should someone die for instance having to explain to a committee why didn't you put the proverbial fire out sooner since you've done so with other repos. Therefore operating under the common carrier and public space provisions of the law and going the way of "the best code of conduct is no code of conduct" (aka less is more) route would have been much safer than Github's current practice of indiscriminate takedowns and get this is actually closer to other parts of its terms of service such as "You shall defend GitHub against any claim, demand, suit or proceeding made or brought against GitHub by a third-party alleging that Your Content, or Your use of the Service in violation of this Agreement" which place the burden on users rather than Github as being responsible for content. But of course since Github now wants to do the opposite of the weightier legal parts of its terms of service by placing more weight on the "General Conditions" section than the "Content Ownership" section, then we the users are not going to be the only ones responsible for anything that happens which is likely not what Github would want.

Overall this trend of censorship in the public space by private corporations is rather dumb.
@onodera-punpun

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@onodera-punpun

onodera-punpun Aug 11, 2015

@krainboltgreene

Gitlabs coc doesn't have a section about how "reverse -ism" don't exist (aka "I'm a racist and/or sexist, but I don't want to be called a racist/sexist so I redefine words), and githubs to-be coc hopefully won't either: https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/84

onodera-punpun replied Aug 11, 2015

@krainboltgreene

Gitlabs coc doesn't have a section about how "reverse -ism" don't exist (aka "I'm a racist and/or sexist, but I don't want to be called a racist/sexist so I redefine words), and githubs to-be coc hopefully won't either: https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/84
@domgetter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@domgetter

domgetter Aug 12, 2015

@krainboltgreene You don't get to sit on your moral high horse yelling "ethics" and simultaneously call people "assholes" that disagree with you. Perhaps you should spend some time attempting to come to a consistent and reasonable position.

domgetter replied Aug 12, 2015

@krainboltgreene You don't get to sit on your moral high horse yelling "ethics" and simultaneously call people "assholes" that disagree with you. Perhaps you should spend some time attempting to come to a consistent and reasonable position.
@Faiz7412

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Faiz7412

Faiz7412 Aug 13, 2015

Everyone, let's settle the debate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb2mVGE63YU

Faiz7412 replied Aug 13, 2015

Everyone, let's settle the debate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb2mVGE63YU
@dandv

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dandv

dandv Sep 2, 2015

Hey @github, how about censoring all repos that show up at http://www.commitlogsfromlastnight.com/ ?

dandv replied Sep 2, 2015

Hey @github, how about censoring all repos that show up at http://www.commitlogsfromlastnight.com/ ?
@ticki

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ticki

ticki Jan 22, 2016

This thread reads like 4chan.

ticki replied Jan 22, 2016

This thread reads like 4chan.
@RevanProdigalKnight

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@RevanProdigalKnight

RevanProdigalKnight Jan 22, 2016

Wow guys, way to necro a thread.

RevanProdigalKnight replied Jan 22, 2016

Wow guys, way to necro a thread.
@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Jan 22, 2016

I wonder if there's any commit with more comments than this one.

jmendeth replied Jan 22, 2016

I wonder if there's any commit with more comments than this one.
@fbt

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fbt

fbt Jan 22, 2016

This thread reads like 4chan.

It's 4chan that reads like this thread!

fbt replied Jan 22, 2016

This thread reads like 4chan.

It's 4chan that reads like this thread!
@joepie91

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joepie91

joepie91 Jan 22, 2016

@jmendeth: I wonder if there's any commit with more comments than this one.

Oh yes. Yes, there is.

joepie91 replied Jan 22, 2016

@jmendeth: I wonder if there's any commit with more comments than this one.

Oh yes. Yes, there is.
@jmendeth

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jmendeth

jmendeth Jan 22, 2016

@joepie91 Oh.

Not sure if feeling jealous or relieved right now.

jmendeth replied Jan 22, 2016

@joepie91 Oh.

Not sure if feeling jealous or relieved right now.
@joepie91

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joepie91

joepie91 Jan 22, 2016

@jmendeth Well, to be fair, that one destroyed entire systems.

joepie91 replied Jan 22, 2016

@jmendeth Well, to be fair, that one destroyed entire systems.
@mryellow

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mryellow

mryellow Feb 7, 2016

Disgusting github, absolutely disgusting.

mryellow replied Feb 7, 2016

Disgusting github, absolutely disgusting.
@nuxy

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nuxy

nuxy Feb 7, 2016

Not even worth thinking about people. It's just a word dammit.

Reminds me of this intelligent Kids in the Hall skit.

nuxy replied Feb 7, 2016

Not even worth thinking about people. It's just a word dammit.

Reminds me of this intelligent Kids in the Hall skit.
@RichardJCase

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@RichardJCase

RichardJCase Feb 3, 2017

🍆

RichardJCase replied Feb 3, 2017

🍆
@mryellow

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mryellow

mryellow Feb 3, 2017

Absolutely ridiculous.

Love the irony that git is an offensive term ;-)

mryellow replied Feb 3, 2017

Absolutely ridiculous.

Love the irony that git is an offensive term ;-)
@krainboltgreene

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@krainboltgreene

krainboltgreene Feb 3, 2017

krainboltgreene replied Feb 3, 2017

@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Feb 4, 2017

oh god please let's not start this again

*cough* but yes, in no way does the word "git" have any sort of historical meaning compared to "retard" which is hurtful to those with learning disabilities. "git" is the same as calling someone "silly" and it REALLY doesn't come close to calling someone a slur. Also "muh freeze peach" doesn't apply on a private website with their own code of conduct. In any case, why not let all people feel welcome? If you wanna go ahead and say that shit, go ahead, but don't be surprised when people call you a dick. (Also inb4 skids try to make a counterpoint by saying that calling someone a dick is just as bad as saying "retard") *cough*

piedoom replied Feb 4, 2017 •
edited
Edited 1 time
  • @piedoom piedoom edited Feb 4, 2017 (most recent)

oh god please let's not start this again

*cough* but yes, in no way does the word "git" have any sort of historical meaning compared to "retard" which is hurtful to those with learning disabilities. "git" is the same as calling someone "silly" and it REALLY doesn't come close to calling someone a slur. Also "muh freeze peach" doesn't apply on a private website with their own code of conduct. In any case, why not let all people feel welcome? If you wanna go ahead and say that shit, go ahead, but don't be surprised when people call you a dick. (Also inb4 skids try to make a counterpoint by saying that calling someone a dick is just as bad as saying "retard") *cough*
@ticki

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ticki

ticki Feb 4, 2017

Get over it, snowflakes. You are just like the "sjws" you're complaining about. You ain't havin' none of those freeze peaches.

ticki replied Feb 4, 2017

Get over it, snowflakes. You are just like the "sjws" you're complaining about. You ain't havin' none of those freeze peaches.
@snow-frog

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@snow-frog

snow-frog Feb 4, 2017

sage and hide

snow-frog replied Feb 4, 2017

sage and hide
@dandv

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dandv

dandv Feb 4, 2017

There are two kinds of people in this world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

dandv replied Feb 4, 2017

There are two kinds of people in this world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
@hendraanggrian

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@hendraanggrian

hendraanggrian Feb 17, 2017

Now I wonder, what else could they possibly ban?

hendraanggrian replied Feb 17, 2017

Now I wonder, what else could they possibly ban?
@makc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@makc

makc Feb 18, 2017

love
dprk

makc replied Feb 18, 2017

love
dprk
@ddraws

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ddraws

ddraws Apr 16, 2017

Hope in humanity: -20pt

ddraws replied Apr 16, 2017

Hope in humanity: -20pt
@MrStonedOne

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@MrStonedOne

MrStonedOne Apr 16, 2017

Why am I still subscribed to this commit?

MrStonedOne replied Apr 16, 2017

Why am I still subscribed to this commit?
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Apr 16, 2017

idk b

piedoom replied Apr 16, 2017

idk b
@woat

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@woat

woat Apr 28, 2017

hahahahahah

woat replied Apr 28, 2017

hahahahahah
@ergo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ergo

ergo Jun 7, 2017

Just host on your own with https://rhodecode.com/ - Supports git,mercurial and svn + its open source.

ergo replied Jun 7, 2017

Just host on your own with https://rhodecode.com/ - Supports git,mercurial and svn + its open source.
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jun 7, 2017

anyone else in this thread smoke weed

piedoom replied Jun 7, 2017

anyone else in this thread smoke weed
@jjvvx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jjvvx

jjvvx Jul 7, 2017

when's the emoji movie coming out btw

jjvvx replied Jul 7, 2017

when's the emoji movie coming out btw
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jul 7, 2017

july 28th 2017

piedoom replied Jul 7, 2017

july 28th 2017
@jjvvx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jjvvx

jjvvx Jul 7, 2017

jjvvx replied Jul 7, 2017

@ticki

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ticki

ticki Jul 22, 2017

only 6 days left

ticki replied Jul 22, 2017

only 6 days left
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jul 23, 2017

5 days to go.

piedoom replied Jul 23, 2017

5 days to go.
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jul 27, 2017

@ticki @Joaquin-V @nixxquality @go1dfish @MarbleFag @tolbiac110 @smeezekitty @woat @ergo @makc @ddraws @hendraanggrian @snow-frog @mryellow @nuxy @RichardJCase

emoji movie in theaters tomorrow. who up to go?

piedoom replied Jul 27, 2017

@ticki @Joaquin-V @nixxquality @go1dfish @MarbleFag @tolbiac110 @smeezekitty @woat @ergo @makc @ddraws @hendraanggrian @snow-frog @mryellow @nuxy @RichardJCase

emoji movie in theaters tomorrow. who up to go?
@onodera-punpun

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@onodera-punpun

onodera-punpun Jul 27, 2017

Anyone wants do some kind of live viewing thing once it's up for download? Where we discuss the movie live in this thread?

onodera-punpun replied Jul 27, 2017

Anyone wants do some kind of live viewing thing once it's up for download? Where we discuss the movie live in this thread?
@ticki

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ticki

ticki Jul 27, 2017

Sounds cool to me.

ticki replied Jul 27, 2017

Sounds cool to me.
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jul 27, 2017

Great idea.

piedoom replied Jul 27, 2017

Great idea.
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jul 29, 2017

hey guys, i found this new book and i was wondering if any of you had any thoughts.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

piedoom replied Jul 29, 2017

hey guys, i found this new book and i was wondering if any of you had any thoughts.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
@ticki

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ticki

ticki Aug 4, 2017

@piedoom A good read indeed.

ticki replied Aug 4, 2017

@piedoom A good read indeed.
@jjvvx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jjvvx

jjvvx Aug 13, 2017

jjvvx replied Aug 13, 2017

@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Aug 14, 2017

my name isnt

piedoom replied Aug 14, 2017

my name isnt
@VirtusB

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@VirtusB

VirtusB May 4, 2018

Retards

VirtusB replied May 4, 2018

Retards
@piedoom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@piedoom

piedoom Jun 2, 2018

add me on facebook please,

piedoom replied Jun 2, 2018

add me on facebook please,
Please sign in to comment.