Alternative implementation of NLOHMANN_DEFINE_TYPE_INTRUSIVE #2399
pfeatherstone
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
There is no upper bound on the number of member variables. But, though the string |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Instead of using the current macro expansion of
NLOHMANN_DEFINE_TYPE_INTRUSIVE
, which imposes an upper bound on the number of member variables, why not use something like this:Note that a better
split
function could be used. @nlohmann sorry i didn't suggest this at the time when these macros were in development.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions