Skip to content

Conversation

@amandesai01
Copy link
Contributor

Change Summary

394656988-6e7fd125-adca-424f-aab3-a98cec1ee88a

Change type

style: (formatting, missing semi colons, etc; no production code change)\

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 13, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the DefaultValue.vue component focus on refining the default value input functionality within the smartsheet column. The modifications include updating the LazySmartsheetCell component's class attribute, enhancing the onMounted lifecycle hook, and introducing computed properties to manage the visibility of the current date option. The core functionality remains consistent, with improvements aimed at improving the component's responsiveness and state management.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/column/DefaultValue.vue - Updated LazySmartsheetCell component class with max-w-full
- Enhanced onMounted hook to initialize cdfValue
- Added computed properties showCurrentDateOption and isCurrentDate
- Preserved template structure with conditional rendering

Suggested labels

👓 Scope : View, size:S, lgtm

Suggested reviewers

  • dstala

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1835498 and fa9a324.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/column/DefaultValue.vue (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/column/DefaultValue.vue

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b676a31 and 7cef5ae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/cell/SingleSelect.vue (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/nc-gui/components/cell/SingleSelect.vue (3)

Line range hint 452-461: LGTM! Well-structured option creation UI

The implementation provides excellent user feedback with:

  • Clear visual hierarchy using flex layout
  • Proper internationalization
  • Intuitive icon usage

Line range hint 474-524: LGTM! Well-organized styles with proper scoping

The styling implementation follows Vue.js best practices:

  • Proper use of scoped styles
  • Appropriate usage of deep selectors for third-party component styling
  • Consistent use of Tailwind utilities

390-390: Verify similar select components for consistent width handling

Let's check if other select components might benefit from the same width fix.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual implementation details of these components to make a more informed decision.


Fixed width implementation is specific to this component's use case

The width implementation (!w-[360px]) in SingleSelect.vue is specific to its usage context and doesn't indicate a pattern that needs to be replicated. Other components with fixed widths (!w-[NNNpx]) are using different values appropriate to their contexts:

  • UITypesOptionsWithSearch.vue uses !w-[164px] for an image
  • LinkedItems.vue uses !w-[158px] for a placeholder image
  • SingleSelect.vue uses !w-[360px] for the select dropdown

The implementation is correctly addressing the overflow issue specific to this component without affecting other select components in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other select components with potential width issues
echo "Searching for other select components with width classes..."
rg -l "class=\".*w-full.*\".*<(NcSelect|a-select)" packages/nc-gui/components/

echo "Searching for other components with fixed width implementations..."
rg -l "class=\".*!w-\[\d+px\].*\"" packages/nc-gui/components/

Length of output: 1088


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual width implementations in the found files
echo "Checking width implementations in select components:"
rg -A 2 -B 2 "!w-\[\d+px\]" packages/nc-gui/components/cell/SingleSelect.vue packages/nc-gui/components/virtual-cell/components/LinkedItems.vue packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/column/UITypesOptionsWithSearch.vue

echo -e "\nChecking select component implementations:"
rg -A 2 -B 2 "<(NcSelect|a-select)" packages/nc-gui/components/cell/SingleSelect.vue packages/nc-gui/components/virtual-cell/components/LinkedItems.vue packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/column/UITypesOptionsWithSearch.vue

Length of output: 3414

ref="aselect"
v-model:value="vModel"
class="w-full overflow-hidden"
class="!w-[360px] overflow-hidden"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a responsive width approach

The fixed width of !w-[360px] with an important modifier might cause issues:

  1. It could overflow on smaller screens
  2. The use of !important suggests potential CSS specificity issues

Consider using a more flexible width approach:

-class="!w-[360px] overflow-hidden"
+class="w-full max-w-[360px] overflow-hidden"

This maintains the desired maximum width while being responsive on smaller screens.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
class="!w-[360px] overflow-hidden"
class="w-full max-w-[360px] overflow-hidden"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Uffizzi Preview deployment-59090 was deleted.

@o1lab o1lab force-pushed the nc-fix/select-gui-improvements branch from 7cef5ae to 1835498 Compare December 16, 2024 09:46
@o1lab o1lab force-pushed the nc-fix/select-gui-improvements branch from 1835498 to fa9a324 Compare December 16, 2024 09:53
@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 merged commit 9abe9d0 into develop Dec 16, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 deleted the nc-fix/select-gui-improvements branch December 16, 2024 10:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants