Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

development roadmap #211

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 30, 2013
Merged

development roadmap #211

merged 2 commits into from Dec 30, 2013

Conversation

chris-rock
Copy link
Member

I wrote down a new version of our development roadmap. Of course this pull request is up for discussion and changes are welcome.

Main focus:

  • security
  • stability

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member Author

@imaginator: any security improvements we should think of
cc @dodo @lloydwatkin @astro @silverbucket

@lloydwatkin
Copy link
Member

This all seems great.

Short term I'd like to:

  • fulfil the manifesto requirements/suggestions
  • Test the client websocket connection against latest spec (and update if required)

Get a 👍 from a couple of others and I'm happy for you to merge :)

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member Author

Is there anything I should change to meet your vision?

@imaginator
Copy link

A roadmap to full DNSSEC validation would also be nice and give the
warm-fuzzy feeling that it will be supported in the future.

Simon Tennant | buddycloud.com | +49 17 8545 0880 | office hours:
goo.gl/tQgxP
On 14 Dec 2013 10:37, "Christoph Hartmann" notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there anything I should change to meet your vision?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/211#issuecomment-30570785
.

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member Author

@imaginator dnssec is on the roadmap

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member Author

can we merge this?

lloydwatkin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2013
@lloydwatkin lloydwatkin merged commit 4ef596c into xmppjs:master Dec 30, 2013
@chris-rock chris-rock deleted the roadmap branch December 30, 2013 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants