Permalink
Browse files

benchmark: fix typos

PR-URL: #11287
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
  • Loading branch information...
seishun authored and italoacasas committed Feb 10, 2017
1 parent 2333cd3 commit 5059b6fcee4f90d77a6905bba82e384f898425ce
Showing with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
  1. +4 −4 benchmark/README.md
View
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ either [`wrk`][wrk] or [`autocannon`][autocannon].
path, hence if you want to compare two HTTP benchmark runs make sure that the
Node version in the path is not altered.
`wrk` may be available through your preferred package manger. If not, you can
`wrk` may be available through your preferred package manager. If not, you can
easily build it [from source][wrk] via `make`.
By default `wrk` will be used as benchmarker. If it is not available
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ In the event you get a message that you need to select a CRAN mirror first.
You can specify a mirror by adding in the repo parameter.
If we used the "http://cran.us.r-project.org" mirror, it could look somehting like
this:
If we used the "http://cran.us.r-project.org" mirror, it could look something
like this:
```R
install.packages("ggplot2", repo="http://cran.us.r-project.org")
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ to be no improvements, then there shouldn't be any stars.
**A word of caution:** Statistics is not a foolproof tool. If a benchmark shows
a statistical significant difference, there is a 5% risk that this
difference doesn't actually exists. For a single benchmark this is not an
difference doesn't actually exist. For a single benchmark this is not an
issue. But when considering 20 benchmarks it's normal that one of them
will show significance, when it shouldn't. A possible solution is to instead
consider at least two stars (`**`) as the threshold, in that case the risk

0 comments on commit 5059b6f

Please sign in to comment.