Docker build cleanup

[dnlup]

Remove .dokerignore file and use consistent naming in npm scripts.

Fixes #638 .

[dnlup]

I think the main drawback we have here js that now we are sending the whole root dir as a context before building the image:

• https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#dockerignore-file

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #648 (75d52b9) into main (c021f8b) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #648      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.50%   97.56%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1685     1685              
==========================================
+ Hits         1643     1644       +1     
+ Misses         42       41       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/llhttp/parser.js	93.05% <0.00%> (+0.69%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c021f8b...75d52b9. Read the comment docs.

[ronag]

I think the main drawback we have here js that now we are sending the whole root dir as a context before building the image:

• https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#dockerignore-file

Good point. Maybe do both then? COPY and dockerignore?

[dnlup]

I think the main drawback we have here js that now we are sending the whole root dir as a context before building the image:

• https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#dockerignore-file

Good point. Maybe do both then? COPY and dockerignore?

Yes. Just to be sure, we still won't COPY . . but each asset needed individually, right?

[dnlup]

I opted for a "exclude everything" by default. It keeps the list shorter.

[dnlup]

I took the liberty of renaming the scripts to make them more consistent.

[mcollina]

lgtm