Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2022. It is now read-only.

browserDependencies #9354

Closed
monolithed opened this issue Aug 20, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

browserDependencies #9354

monolithed opened this issue Aug 20, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@monolithed
Copy link

@othiym23
There is discussion of a new browserDependencies (name not final, almost certain to change, don't hold us to this, etc.) dependency type to to handle dependencies that are guaranteed to be flat and that will error on conflicts, which may or may not install to somewhere other than node_modules, but this is not generally desirable behavior for regular npm dependencies, configurably or otherwise. Regardless of its eventual semantics, it will not be part of the npm@3 release.

There're many different solutions:

spm
jam
bower
component
volo
broccoli
npm with browserify

All of these solutions are patches for npm.
And I really don't understand why frontend is ignored by npm for many years...

Is there any plan to support browserDependencies?
Thanks.

@othiym23
Copy link
Contributor

This is on the npm road map, and is a fairly high-priority project for the team.

@zkat
Copy link
Contributor

zkat commented Jan 22, 2016

This is a big thing we really want to do, and it's been on our roadmap for a while. Having a straightforward, usable way of using npm for browser-based dependencies is super important.

Unfortunately, because of other priorities, we don't know when we're going to get to this. As such, I'm going to close this issue, and we'll reopen it in the future when we have a proposal ready for the community to iterate upon.

@stramel
Copy link

stramel commented Oct 11, 2016

Is there any update on this? It sounds like exactly what I'm wanting

@honkskillet
Copy link

Updates?

@legodude17
Copy link
Contributor

@othiym23 or @zkat will reopen this when the CLI team is ready to work on this. Remember, the CLI team is quite small and has a lot of work to do, as show by the 2,000+ issues open here.

@wclr
Copy link

wclr commented Nov 7, 2016

yarn has a like proposaal https://github.com/yarnpkg/rfcs/issues/13

@monolithed
Copy link
Author

@whitecolor, not the same issue, here it is #13479

@klihelp
Copy link

klihelp commented Feb 5, 2017

+1

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants