-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
Licensing your nREPL contributions under EPL #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Milestone
Comments
OK |
1 similar comment
OK |
OK (edited to remove the long commentary that made Chas laugh)
|
OK |
1 similar comment
OK |
OK
…Sent from my iPad
On Oct 9, 2017, at 19:52, Chas Emerick ***@***.***> wrote:
For background, please see #1.
Your contributions to nREPL over the years are greatly appreciated. To better serve all of the users of nREPL, and to simplify things for those that are most impacted by the project, I am pulling development here (where the project began some 8 years ago).
Note that the license is not changing from EPL, the license that has always governed nREPL contributions. However, your commits were submitted through the Clojure Contrib process, which carries additional terms. Since I am seeking to excise the Contrib/CA heritage from the project, and IANAL, I'm now asking to reaffirm your licensing of your nREPL commits under "regular" EPL terms, so they may be included here.
Once all contributors indicate their assent here, I will reconstruct the nREPL commit history to include only your work, which will drop things like minor build process changes, commits by the build.clojure.org buildbot, etc. My hope is that the result will be a place where people invested in nREPL and the tools that depend upon it can collaborate using familiar practices and a set of enthusiastically shared expectations.
tl;dr
If you agree to license your contributions to tools.nrepl under the Eclipse Public License, please respond here with "OK" or similar. This will unambiguously allow those contributions to be used in other EPL-licensed contexts (including this project) without consideration of the Clojure Contribution Agreement (CA), under which those contributions were made originally.
If you do not agree, please indicate this in a comment as well, or contact me directly by email.
The roster of contributors with material commits in the tools.nrepl history are as follows:
@cemerick
@kotarak
@trptcolin
@bbatsov
@gfredericks
@cichli
@andrewhr
@hugoduncan
@jeffvalk
@jafingerhut
@brandonbloom
@duelinmarkers
@misfo
@ato
@lprefontaine
Thank you again for your work.
|
OK |
1 similar comment
OK |
OK
…On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Chas Emerick ***@***.***> wrote:
For background, please see #1 <#1>
.
Your contributions to nREPL over the years are greatly appreciated. To
better serve all of the users of nREPL, and to simplify things for those
that are most impacted by the project, I am pulling development here (where
the project began some 8 years ago).
Note that the license is *not* changing from EPL, the license that has
always governed nREPL contributions. However, your commits were submitted
through the Clojure Contrib process, which carries additional terms. Since
I am seeking to excise the Contrib/CA heritage from the project, and IANAL,
I'm now asking to reaffirm your licensing of your nREPL commits under
"regular" EPL terms, so they may be included here.
Once all contributors indicate their assent here, I will reconstruct the
nREPL commit history to include only your work, which will drop things like
minor build process changes, commits by the build.clojure.org buildbot,
etc. My hope is that the result will be a place where people invested in
nREPL and the tools that depend upon it can collaborate using familiar
practices and a set of enthusiastically shared expectations.
tl;dr
If you agree to license your contributions to tools.nrepl
<https://github.com/clojure/tools.nrepl/> under the Eclipse Public License
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html>, please respond here with
"OK" or similar. This will unambiguously allow those contributions to be
used in other EPL-licensed contexts (including this project) without
consideration of the Clojure Contribution Agreement (CA), under which those
contributions were made originally.
If you do not agree, please indicate this in a comment as well, or contact
me directly by email ***@***.***>.
The roster of contributors with material commits in the tools.nrepl
<https://github.com/clojure/tools.nrepl/> history are as follows:
- @cemerick <https://github.com/cemerick>
- @kotarak <https://github.com/kotarak>
- @trptcolin <https://github.com/trptcolin>
- @bbatsov <https://github.com/bbatsov>
- @gfredericks <https://github.com/gfredericks>
- @cichli <https://github.com/cichli>
- @andrewhr <https://github.com/andrewhr>
- @hugoduncan <https://github.com/hugoduncan>
- @jeffvalk <https://github.com/jeffvalk>
- @jafingerhut <https://github.com/jafingerhut>
- @brandonbloom <https://github.com/brandonbloom>
- @duelinmarkers <https://github.com/duelinmarkers>
- @misfo <https://github.com/misfo>
- @ato <https://github.com/ato>
- @lprefontaine <https://github.com/lprefontaine>
Thank you again for your work.
|
OK
Gary Fredericks
(803)-295-0195
fredericksgary@gmail.com
gfredericks.com
…On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Chas Emerick ***@***.***> wrote:
For background, please see #1 <#1>
.
Your contributions to nREPL over the years are greatly appreciated. To
better serve all of the users of nREPL, and to simplify things for those
that are most impacted by the project, I am pulling development here (where
the project began some 8 years ago).
Note that the license is *not* changing from EPL, the license that has
always governed nREPL contributions. However, your commits were submitted
through the Clojure Contrib process, which carries additional terms. Since
I am seeking to excise the Contrib/CA heritage from the project, and IANAL,
I'm now asking to reaffirm your licensing of your nREPL commits under
"regular" EPL terms, so they may be included here.
Once all contributors indicate their assent here, I will reconstruct the
nREPL commit history to include only your work, which will drop things like
minor build process changes, commits by the build.clojure.org buildbot,
etc. My hope is that the result will be a place where people invested in
nREPL and the tools that depend upon it can collaborate using familiar
practices and a set of enthusiastically shared expectations.
tl;dr
If you agree to license your contributions to tools.nrepl
<https://github.com/clojure/tools.nrepl/> under the Eclipse Public License
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html>, please respond here with
"OK" or similar. This will unambiguously allow those contributions to be
used in other EPL-licensed contexts (including this project) without
consideration of the Clojure Contribution Agreement (CA), under which those
contributions were made originally.
If you do not agree, please indicate this in a comment as well, or contact
me directly by email ***@***.***>.
The roster of contributors with material commits in the tools.nrepl
<https://github.com/clojure/tools.nrepl/> history are as follows:
- @cemerick <https://github.com/cemerick>
- @kotarak <https://github.com/kotarak>
- @trptcolin <https://github.com/trptcolin>
- @bbatsov <https://github.com/bbatsov>
- @gfredericks <https://github.com/gfredericks>
- @cichli <https://github.com/cichli>
- @andrewhr <https://github.com/andrewhr>
- @hugoduncan <https://github.com/hugoduncan>
- @jeffvalk <https://github.com/jeffvalk>
- @jafingerhut <https://github.com/jafingerhut>
- @brandonbloom <https://github.com/brandonbloom>
- @duelinmarkers <https://github.com/duelinmarkers>
- @misfo <https://github.com/misfo>
- @ato <https://github.com/ato>
- @lprefontaine <https://github.com/lprefontaine>
Thank you again for your work.
|
OK |
1 similar comment
OK |
@seancorfield oh, you didn't need to edit. It was good! :-D |
OK
… Am 09.10.2017 um 20:52 schrieb Chas Emerick ***@***.***>:
m
|
OK |
2 similar comments
OK |
OK |
We now have unanimous consent on this issue from all tools.nrepl contributors. Thank you very much to everyone for taking the time to consider this. I'll close and lock this now, so as to keep your notifications as clean as possible; further action will happen over on #1 and related issues. 💯 |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
For background, please see #1.
Your contributions to nREPL over the years are greatly appreciated. To better serve all of the users of nREPL, and to simplify things for those that are most impacted by the project, I am pulling development here (where the project began some 8 years ago).
Note that the license is not changing from EPL, the license that has always governed nREPL contributions. However, your commits were submitted through the Clojure Contrib process, which carries additional terms. Since I am seeking to excise the Contrib/CA heritage from the project, and IANAL, I'm now asking to reaffirm your licensing of your nREPL commits under "regular" EPL terms, so they may be included here.
Once all contributors indicate their assent here, I will reconstruct the nREPL commit history to include only your work, which will drop things like minor build process changes, commits by the build.clojure.org buildbot, etc. My hope is that the result will be a place where people invested in nREPL and the tools that depend upon it can collaborate using familiar practices and a set of enthusiastically shared expectations.
tl;dr
If you agree to license your contributions to tools.nrepl under the Eclipse Public License, please respond here with "OK" or similar. This will unambiguously allow those contributions to be used in other EPL-licensed contexts (including this project) without consideration of the Clojure Contribution Agreement (CA), under which those contributions were made originally.
If you do not agree, please indicate this in a comment as well, or contact me directly by email.
The roster of contributors with material commits in the tools.nrepl history are as follows:
Thank you again for your work.♥️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: