Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Unpacked packages aren't handled at all #2

Closed
nsf opened this issue Aug 14, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

Unpacked packages aren't handled at all #2

nsf opened this issue Aug 14, 2010 · 1 comment

Comments

@nsf
Copy link
Owner

nsf commented Aug 14, 2010

(e.g. not '.a' but '.5' or '.6' or '.8')
Need to fix parser for that.
@nsf
Copy link
Owner Author

nsf commented Sep 21, 2010

Add hack for parsing .5/.6/.8 files. Closed by 8e4fdf8

charlievieth pushed a commit to charlievieth/gocode that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2018
@nsf
Add hack for parsing .5/.6/.8 files. Closes nsf#2
8e4fdf8
charlievieth pushed a commit to charlievieth/gocode that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2018
@mdempsky
suggest: test coverage for qualified struct type names
c7f3ed8 
Updates nsf#2.
charlievieth pushed a commit to charlievieth/gocode that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2018
@mdempsky
suggest: test coverage for method expression selection on invalid type
fee1a19 
Updates nsf#2.
charlievieth pushed a commit to charlievieth/gocode that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2018
@mdempsky
suggest: basic test coverage for formatters
0fab55a 
Examples taken from docs/autocomplete_formats.md.

Updates nsf#2.
charlievieth pushed a commit to charlievieth/gocode that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2018
@mdempsky
suggest: remove broken import path suggestion code
f8e5cbc 
This code is untested and doesn't seem to work upstream either. Given
that nowadays we have goimports to automatically add import
statements, its usefulness seems limited anyway.

Updates nsf#2.
charlievieth pushed a commit to charlievieth/gocode that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2018
@mdempsky
lookdot: more test coverage
bba7ee5 
Effectively done.

Updates nsf#2.
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nsf