Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define packaging targets #1304

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 27, 2016
Merged

Define packaging targets #1304

merged 3 commits into from Dec 27, 2016

Conversation

lgeiger
Copy link
Member

@lgeiger lgeiger commented Dec 27, 2016

Main changes:

  • restores the AppImage build for linux
  • compresses unpacked build folder into zip (Windows) or tar.gz (Linux) archive

@lgeiger lgeiger changed the title Packaging Define packaging targets Dec 27, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 92.06% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1304 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #1304   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            57         57          
  Lines          1474       1474          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits           1357       1357          
  Misses          117        117          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 52d0d3e...132ba4d

@rgbkrk rgbkrk merged commit 974cdd2 into nteract:master Dec 27, 2016
@lgeiger lgeiger deleted the packaging branch December 27, 2016 16:29
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Apr 3, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 3, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants