New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate transaction logging into its own worker #6
Comments
Merged
ntietz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2022
ntietz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 18, 2022
This completes #6 by separating out the transaction logging behavior into its own worker.
ntietz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2023
ntietz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2023
This completes #6 by separating out the transaction logging behavior into its own worker.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As written in PR #5 , transaction logging is wholly owned by the storage engine. This tightly couples them and prevents permitting, say, delaying writes to the log or batching writes to the log for better efficiency. As shown on the Architecture page, it would be nice to split this out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: