Skip to content

Nanfuncs #30

wants to merge 1 commit into from

3 participants

rigtorp commented Dec 31, 2010

Zero copy nan handling functions, faster mean() and std().

NumPy member
rgommers commented Apr 3, 2011

If this is not significantly faster then Bottleneck (, I would say that this should not be added. Even if it is, I'm not sure that the gain outweighs the decrease in maintainability.

By faster mean() and std() I'm not sure you are talking about the nan versions, since this does not make any changes to the current implementation. Improvements to current mean() and std() ufuncs should be a separate issue.

NumPy member
charris commented May 3, 2013

Time to close this.

@charris charris closed this May 3, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.