We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In #2489 we introduced a new helper method ConstraintUtils.RequireActual to verify that a given instance is a given type. The method was used in CollectionConstraint (https://github.com/nunit/nunit/pull/2489/files#diff-0bd8c864e13609fb56985f6d45dcd0d7R73) and CollectionEquivalentConstraint (https://github.com/nunit/nunit/pull/2489/files#diff-511119f00b739abcc41ccb36df45f89fR98), but we have other places were we could also use this method. At least we should use the method in the following places:
ConstraintUtils.RequireActual
CollectionConstraint
CollectionEquivalentConstraint
Please add tests if any of the places above is not covered by tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll take this if possible
Sorry, something went wrong.
Welcome! That was quick! 😄
Fixed by #2503 Thanks for the work @Breemua 👍
No branches or pull requests
In #2489 we introduced a new helper method
ConstraintUtils.RequireActual
to verify that a given instance is a given type. The method was used inCollectionConstraint
(https://github.com/nunit/nunit/pull/2489/files#diff-0bd8c864e13609fb56985f6d45dcd0d7R73) andCollectionEquivalentConstraint
(https://github.com/nunit/nunit/pull/2489/files#diff-511119f00b739abcc41ccb36df45f89fR98), but we have other places were we could also use this method. At least we should use the method in the following places:Please add tests if any of the places above is not covered by tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: