MSHTML: virtualBuffer for embedded applications does not listen for DOM mutations #4798

Closed
nvaccessAuto opened this Issue Jan 14, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@nvaccessAuto

Reported by mdcurran on 2015-01-14 03:51
in MSHTML virtualBuffers, we currently listen for DOM mutations (insertion and removal of DOM nodes) by using MSHTML's iMarkupPointer interfaces. However, we only request this for body and frameset nodes. Therefore, if you were to force creation of a virtualBuffer within an ARIA application that was deeper than the body node, NVDA would not listen for DOM mutations for the inner virtualBuffer.
We need to track whether an MSHTML controlFieldNode in a virtualBuffer is / will be the root of the backend's buffer or not, if it is, then this should be good enough to request DOM mutation listening, even if this node is not the body or a frameset.

@nvaccessAuto

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@nvaccessAuto

nvaccessAuto Jan 14, 2015

Attachment domMutationInAndOutOfEmbeddedApp.html added by mdcurran on 2015-01-14 03:53
Description:
Testcase allowing for DOM mutations both in the main document, and within an embedded ARIA application.

Attachment domMutationInAndOutOfEmbeddedApp.html added by mdcurran on 2015-01-14 03:53
Description:
Testcase allowing for DOM mutations both in the main document, and within an embedded ARIA application.

@nvaccessAuto

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@nvaccessAuto

nvaccessAuto Jan 14, 2015

Comment 1 by Michael Curran <mick@... on 2015-01-14 04:05
In [108c7d5]:

Merge branch 't4798' into next. Incubates #4798

Changes:
Added labels: incubating

Comment 1 by Michael Curran <mick@... on 2015-01-14 04:05
In [108c7d5]:

Merge branch 't4798' into next. Incubates #4798

Changes:
Added labels: incubating

@nvaccessAuto

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@nvaccessAuto

nvaccessAuto Jan 29, 2015

Comment 2 by Michael Curran <mick@... on 2015-01-29 00:10
In [ce01493]:

Merge branch 't4798'. Fixes #4798

Changes:
Removed labels: incubating
State: closed

Comment 2 by Michael Curran <mick@... on 2015-01-29 00:10
In [ce01493]:

Merge branch 't4798'. Fixes #4798

Changes:
Removed labels: incubating
State: closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment