New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Blurring an application reads the previous anchor #5292
Comments
Comment 1 by jteh on 2015-08-18 23:46 What is happening here is as follows:
The question is how we can skip step 2 in this case without breaking other focus use cases. |
Comment 2 by jteh on 2015-08-18 23:53
|
Comment 3 by Bogdana (in reply to comment 2) on 2015-08-19 06:32
Thanks for replying! I think we are in a different situation than the one described above. Please review the example here: http://fiddle.jshell.net/u40gx5kk/2/show/ '''Expected:''' NVDA should only read "Link outside application" when you tab-out of "Link within application". Regards, |
Comment 4 by jteh on 2015-08-19 06:52 |
Comment 5 by Bogdana (in reply to comment 4) on 2015-08-19 07:05
I see.. Thanks ! |
Confirmed that this issue still occurs with NVDA 2017.4 |
cc: @mltony |
This issue is still occuring in NVDA 2018.4.1 |
Was about to file an issue for this but GitHub's autocomplete results made me aware of this one instead :) Just for an additional test case: https://codepen.io/scottohara/pen/vPXKMd |
Reported by Bogdana on 2015-08-18 05:14
Hi guys,
While developing an accessibility compliant site for one of our biggest clients, we faced an issue which I believe is a bug of NVDA. I will give you a short example:
If the focus is on Link 1, then you press tab, NVDA reads “application link 2”, which is fine. The issue is when you press tab again – the focus is being placed on Link 3, but NVDA announces “Link 1 Link3”. Link 1 is being announced despite of the fact that it has not been focused. The event when this occurs is blur – i.e. when you blur outside of an application, NVDA reads the first previous anchor, and I cannot get the logic here.
Any thoughts on the matter will be appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: