unusual axiom: all animal cells have microvilli? #455

cmungall opened this Issue Nov 22, 2016 · 1 comment


None yet

2 participants

id: CL:0000548
name: animal cell
namespace: cell
subset: ubprop:upper_level  ! abstract upper-level terms not directly useful for analysis
is_a: CL:0000255  ! eukaryotic cell
relationship: has_part GO:0005902 ! microvillus

is this true? is this some Protege slip-up? I suspect this axiom was meant to go on a different class

addiehl commented Nov 23, 2016

Not my doing.

@cmungall cmungall closed this in 2dd460c Nov 23, 2016
@cmungall cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2016
@cmungall cmungall new releases. Fixes #453 and #455 08a7a62
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment