Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pterygoid muscles classification #1138

Closed
markengelstad opened this Issue Aug 13, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@markengelstad
Copy link

markengelstad commented Aug 13, 2015

image

currently (in hp-edit.owl)
medial pterygoid muscle UBERON:0006718 is subclass of
lateral pterygoid muscle UBERON:0006719

should be subclass of
pterygoid muscle UBERON:0006720

however, when i view these classes in the ontobee hierarchy, they seem correctly classified? (both medial and lateral pterygoid mm are subclasses of pterygoid m.)

@cmungall cmungall closed this in 1dfbed0 Aug 13, 2015

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Aug 13, 2015

OntoBee is showing an ancient uberon, I will file a bug. The core issue was the MPM was asserted to attach to the condylar process - this caused the incorrect classification. OntoBee. I fixed this to just attach to the condyle, back how it was previously. I'm not sure why I temporarily had it on the condylar process. Maybe I made some mistake aligning with FEED? @RDruzinsky did the feed attachments for MPM change in the last 4 months?

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Aug 13, 2015

TODO: assert all medial-lateral pairs to be disjoint

cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.