NCIt cross reference #1149

Closed
CatherineLeroy opened this Issue Sep 21, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@CatherineLeroy

Hello,

As a programmer at the EBI in the SPOT team I am working on updating our cross references to other ontologies.
Of course we import lots of anatomy term from UBERON which have cross references themselves.
I have noticed that in the database_cross_reference section of UBERON terms, you have those type of cross references :
http://ncicb.nci.nih.gov/xml/owl/EVS/Accumbens_Nucleus
When I click those, I get a 404: Page Not Found exception.
Exemple there : http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=UBERON&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001882

Are those the NCIt cross references?

If they are why do you choose to use the label rather then the IRI (http://ncicb.nci.nih.gov/xml/owl/EVS/Thesaurus.owl#C52733) or term id as you seem to do for other cross references?

Thank you very much in advance for your time! :-)
Catherine Leroy
cleroy@ebi.ac.uk

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall Sep 21, 2015

Member

Thanks Catherine

I confirmed with the NCIT developers that the latter form is the correct one (they used to make the URIs include the labels, but this stopped about 5 years ago, and we have been tracking it since)

The xrefs will be switched to the correct URIs in the nexr release

Member

cmungall commented Sep 21, 2015

Thanks Catherine

I confirmed with the NCIT developers that the latter form is the correct one (they used to make the URIs include the labels, but this stopped about 5 years ago, and we have been tracking it since)

The xrefs will be switched to the correct URIs in the nexr release

@cmungall cmungall closed this in 7ac1f62 Sep 21, 2015

cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2015

cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2015

cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2015

@CatherineLeroy

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@CatherineLeroy

CatherineLeroy Sep 22, 2015

On 21 Sep 2015, at 18:38, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks Catherine

I confirmed with the NCIT developers that the latter form is the correct one (they used to make the URIs include the labels, but this stopped about 5 years ago, and we have been tracking it since)

The xrefs will be switched to the correct URIs in the nexr release

Then we won’t have to change them on our side.
Great!
Thanks,
Catherine

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

On 21 Sep 2015, at 18:38, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks Catherine

I confirmed with the NCIT developers that the latter form is the correct one (they used to make the URIs include the labels, but this stopped about 5 years ago, and we have been tracking it since)

The xrefs will be switched to the correct URIs in the nexr release

Then we won’t have to change them on our side.
Great!
Thanks,
Catherine

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment