inter-basipterygium joint #1193

Open
alex-dececchi opened this Issue Jan 26, 2016 · 2 comments

Projects

None yet

3 participants

@alex-dececchi
Member

Ask currently constructed the inter-basipterygium joint is not part of the paired fin/limb skeleton. Could we make it part_of the basipterygium so it can be included on searches of fin/limb skeletal terms?

Thanks
Alex

@cmungall cmungall added the ext label Jan 26, 2016
@cmungall
Member

it can't be part of the basipterygium element if it connects it.

btw, the current axioms are wrong I think. It says it connects a bone to a cartilage. I think you want to make it neutral and connect two elements. @wdahdul - agreed?

@wdahdul
Member
wdahdul commented Jan 26, 2016

Yes, agree we should make it connect basipterygium elements rather than the bone or cartilage.

On Jan 26, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:

it can't be part of the basipterygium element if it connects it.

btw, the current axioms are wrong I think. It says it connects a bone to a cartilage. I think you want to make it neutral and connect two elements. @wdahdul - agreed?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment