incoherency caused by spatial disjointness axiom between PNS and CNS #1236

Closed
cmungall opened this Issue Jul 10, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@cmungall
Member

cmungall commented Jul 10, 2016

From @dosumis

pastedgraphic-1

I believe this comes from mixing the latest uberon nervous-system-subset plus the latest CL. It's probably that CL is bringing in part of an older subset of uberon causing the conflict

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall Jul 10, 2016

Member

wtf is that determined-by... obviously at the root of this

Member

cmungall commented Jul 10, 2016

wtf is that determined-by... obviously at the root of this

@dosumis

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dosumis

dosumis Jul 10, 2016

Contributor

Can't see any reason it should be in the mereotopological relationship hierarchy. Oddly - the relationship to has_part doesn't seem to be in the latest RO. Looks like this is making a cycle => inconsistency even in ontologies that don't use determined_by but have (some?) combinations of part of and has part.

Contributor

dosumis commented Jul 10, 2016

Can't see any reason it should be in the mereotopological relationship hierarchy. Oddly - the relationship to has_part doesn't seem to be in the latest RO. Looks like this is making a cycle => inconsistency even in ontologies that don't use determined_by but have (some?) combinations of part of and has part.

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall Jul 10, 2016

Member

determined by is fine http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002507

It seems somewhere (not in RO) we have an axiom that has-developmental-contribution-from http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002254 is being asserted as a subproperty of determined-by.

This is invalid, and furthermore there is no reason at all for these to be connected. It seems like this is leaking in from somwhere else. Can you tell where this subPropertyOf is coming from (I don't have the source module here)

Member

cmungall commented Jul 10, 2016

determined by is fine http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002507

It seems somewhere (not in RO) we have an axiom that has-developmental-contribution-from http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002254 is being asserted as a subproperty of determined-by.

This is invalid, and furthermore there is no reason at all for these to be connected. It seems like this is leaking in from somwhere else. Can you tell where this subPropertyOf is coming from (I don't have the source module here)

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall Jul 10, 2016

Member

OK, I have tracked it down. Ugly: #1237

Member

cmungall commented Jul 10, 2016

OK, I have tracked it down. Ugly: #1237

@dosumis

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dosumis

dosumis Jul 10, 2016

Contributor

Suspected it might be an ID clash.

Contributor

dosumis commented Jul 10, 2016

Suspected it might be an ID clash.

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall Jul 10, 2016

Member

closing, it will be fixed in next release

Member

cmungall commented Jul 10, 2016

closing, it will be fixed in next release

@cmungall cmungall closed this Jul 10, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment