Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EMAPA terms missing in composite ontology? #663

Open
fbastian opened this Issue Mar 27, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@fbastian
Copy link

fbastian commented Mar 27, 2015

We miss some EMAPA terms for integrating data from MGI. As these terms are present in the EMAPA ontology (ftp://ftp.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/pub/MouseAtlas/Anatomy/EMAPA.obo), I wonder why I can't find them in the composite ontology? (neither as xref, nor taxon equivalent, nor leaf classes). Thanks.

EMAPA:35125
EMAPA:35128
EMAPA:35129
EMAPA:35165
EMAPA:35186
EMAPA:35190
EMAPA:35191
EMAPA:35208
EMAPA:35209
EMAPA:35247
EMAPA:35348
EMAPA:35349
EMAPA:35360
EMAPA:35361
EMAPA:35362
EMAPA:35364
EMAPA:35367
EMAPA:35368
EMAPA:35377
EMAPA:35382
EMAPA:35384
EMAPA:35385
EMAPA:35426
EMAPA:35427
EMAPA:35454
EMAPA:35455
EMAPA:35460
EMAPA:35482
EMAPA:35492
EMAPA:35501
EMAPA:35514
EMAPA:35515
EMAPA:35516
EMAPA:35517
EMAPA:35518
EMAPA:35544
EMAPA:35557
EMAPA:35568
EMAPA:35584
EMAPA:35585
EMAPA:35586
EMAPA:35590
EMAPA:35591
EMAPA:35618
EMAPA:35637
EMAPA:35638
EMAPA:35639
EMAPA:35640
EMAPA:35641
EMAPA:35642
EMAPA:35645
EMAPA:35649
EMAPA:35650
EMAPA:35660
EMAPA:35661
EMAPA:35697
EMAPA:35699
EMAPA:35700
EMAPA:35702
EMAPA:35705
EMAPA:35707
EMAPA:35711
EMAPA:35747
EMAPA:35755
EMAPA:35757
EMAPA:35793
EMAPA:35796
EMAPA:35799
EMAPA:35849
EMAPA:35856
EMAPA:35857
EMAPA:35861
EMAPA:35865
EMAPA:35870
EMAPA:35890
EMAPA:35891
EMAPA:35898
EMAPA:35899
EMAPA:35925
EMAPA:35929
EMAPA:35950
EMAPA:35963
EMAPA:35975
EMAPA:35988
EMAPA:36046
EMAPA:36064
EMAPA:36065
EMAPA:36069
EMAPA:36270
EMAPA:36274
EMAPA:36275
EMAPA:36276
EMAPA:36336
EMAPA:36383
EMAPA:36384
EMAPA:36385
EMAPA:36386
EMAPA:36387
EMAPA:36388
@tfhayamizu

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

tfhayamizu commented Mar 27, 2015

GXD and GUDMAP have been involved in extensive expansion of the EMAPA during the last 18 months or so, and it looks as if all of these EMAPA terms were added during this phase, Our editorial process has been in flux but has stabilized somewhat now, and I would be happy to help sort this out.

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Mar 27, 2015

The composite build was using an out of date version of EMAPA (my fault - the pipeline is a bit complicated here as we do some pre-processing, to replace the non-OBO stage IDs with MmusDv stages). The next build should include all EMAPAs in composite-metazoan, either as xrefs or as leafy nodes.

It would be great to have a more coordinated strategy for the EMAPA uberon integration. We already use the MA-provided xrefs but EMAPA sometimes goes deeper than MA

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.